VS

Mercedes Citan vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (131 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (22400 £ vs 22400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?

Kangoo Compact Van

A Clash of Compact Titans: Mercedes Citan vs. Renault Kangoo

When it comes to small commercial vehicles, the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter are two names that often emerge as leaders in the market. These compact yet robust options provide businesses and individuals alike with versatile solutions to various transportation needs. In this article, we will examine the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance that set these two vehicles apart.

Kangoo Compact Van

Design and Exterior Dimensions

The Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter each offer distinct styles that cater to different tastes and business requirements. The Citan, a high-roof wagon, carries the hallmark elegance of Mercedes-Benz within its 4,498mm length, 1,859mm width, and variable height up to 1,830mm. On the other hand, the Kangoo boasts a more utilitarian cargo van design, slightly longer at 4,910mm, with a width of 1,860mm and a height up to 1,864mm, making it slightly larger and well-suited for transporting larger loads.

Kangoo Compact Van

Powertrain Options and Performance

Under the hood, both models deliver a range of powertrains to suit different driving needs. The Mercedes Citan offers versatility with petrol, diesel, and electric powertrains, with power outputs ranging from 95 to 131 HP. Acceleration figures vary, with the fastest petrol option reaching 100 km/h in 13 seconds, while the fully electric version promises an efficient and smooth ride with a range of up to 280 km.

The Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter, likewise, offers diesel, petrol, and electric engines, boasting power outputs between 75 and 130 HP. Acceleration varies from 11.6 seconds for the petrol engines to a more leisurely 18.9 seconds for some diesel variants, yet its electric variant shines with a slightly longer range of 293 km, ideal for eco-conscious urban commuting.

Kangoo Compact Van

Transmission and Drive Type

Both vehicles feature manual and automatic transmission options, catering to traditionalists and those seeking the ease of an automatic. The front-wheel drive design is standard across all powertrains, ensuring stability and smooth handling in urban environments. The Citan’s dual-clutch automatic transmission offers seamless gear shifts, providing drivers with an elevated driving experience. In contrast, the Kangoo’s emphasis on efficiency includes a practical manual gearbox tailored for everyday utility.

Kangoo Compact Van

Efficiency and Eco-friendliness

Efficiency is a key consideration for these vehicles. The Citan reports consumption between 5.3 and 7.1 liters/100 km for internal combustion engines and as low as 19.3 kWh/100 km for electric variants. The Kangoo counters with fuel consumption figures of 4.9 to 7.0 liters/100 km and electric consumption starting at 18.4 kWh/100 km. Both models contribute to reducing carbon footprints, with the Citan achieving CO2 efficiency classes from A to F, similar to the Kangoo.

Kangoo Compact Van

Interior Comfort and Capacity

Inside, the Mercedes Citan comfortably seats up to five passengers and offers a generous trunk capacity of up to 551 liters, adequate for both commercial and everyday use. The Renault Kangoo prioritizes cargo space, with a payload capacity ranging from 508 to 767 kg, thanks to its focus on maximizing internal space for goods rather than passengers, typically seating just two.

Conclusion: Picking the Perfect Partner

Choosing between the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter largely depends on the specific requirements of potential buyers. The Citan excels with its luxury touches and versatility, making it a strong contender for business owners seeking a blend of prestige and functionality. Meanwhile, the Kangoo stands out for businesses focused on logistics and transport, offering larger cargo capacities and robust practicality.

In the end, both these vehicles demonstrate remarkable innovations and capabilities within the compact transport sector, ensuring that regardless of the choice, buyers can expect dependability, efficiency, and modern technology from either option.

Mercedes Citan

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £ , while the Mercedes Citan costs 22400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Kangoo Compact Van manages with 5.10 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Mercedes Citan with 5.20 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Renault Kangoo Compact Van: with 18.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Mercedes Citan with 19.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.60 kWh.

As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 290 km, about 10 km more than the Mercedes Citan.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Citan has a barely noticeable edge – offering 131 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 11.60 s, while the Mercedes Citan takes 13 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes Citan performs barely noticeable better – reaching 183 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 270 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is barely noticeable lighter – 1493 kg compared to 1556 kg. The difference is around 63 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs evident better – up to 4900 L, which is about 1240 L more than the Mercedes Citan.

When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo Compact Van evident takes the win – 901 kg compared to 644 kg. That’s a difference of about 257 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mercedes Citan
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £22,400
Kangoo Compact Van

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 75 - 122 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 5.5 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.7 - 20.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 270 - 290 km

Mercedes Citan

The Mercedes Citan is a clever urban van that dresses sensible practicality in a surprisingly premium suit, making light work of deliveries and family duties without feeling like a workhorse. With a calm, car-like driving feel, clever interior packaging and the Mercedes badge up front, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want function with a touch of luxury and a wink of personality.

details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
Mercedes Citan
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
22400 - 30100 £
Price
22400 - 37000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh
Electric Range
265 - 280 km
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 167 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1556 - 2010 kg
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
Trunk capacity
0 - 551 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
Width
1859 mm
Width
1860 mm
Height
1811 - 1830 mm
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
Max trunk capacity
1979 - 3660 L
Max trunk capacity
3300 - 4900 L
Payload
485 - 644 kg
Payload
498 - 901 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 - 15.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
Engine capacity
1461 cm3

General

Model Year
2021 - 2024
Model Year
2022 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Citan?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.