Two cars, one duel: Mercedes Citan meets Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
When it comes to small commercial vehicles, the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter are two names that often emerge as leaders in the market. These compact yet robust options provide businesses and individuals alike with versatile solutions to various transportation needs. In this article, we will examine the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance that set these two vehicles apart.
The Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter each offer distinct styles that cater to different tastes and business requirements. The Citan, a high-roof wagon, carries the hallmark elegance of Mercedes-Benz within its 4,498mm length, 1,859mm width, and variable height up to 1,830mm. On the other hand, the Kangoo boasts a more utilitarian cargo van design, slightly longer at 4,910mm, with a width of 1,860mm and a height up to 1,864mm, making it slightly larger and well-suited for transporting larger loads.
Under the hood, both models deliver a range of powertrains to suit different driving needs. The Mercedes Citan offers versatility with petrol, diesel, and electric powertrains, with power outputs ranging from 95 to 131 HP. Acceleration figures vary, with the fastest petrol option reaching 100 km/h in 13 seconds, while the fully electric version promises an efficient and smooth ride with a range of up to 280 km.
The Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter, likewise, offers diesel, petrol, and electric engines, boasting power outputs between 75 and 130 HP. Acceleration varies from 11.6 seconds for the petrol engines to a more leisurely 18.9 seconds for some diesel variants, yet its electric variant shines with a slightly longer range of 293 km, ideal for eco-conscious urban commuting.
Both vehicles feature manual and automatic transmission options, catering to traditionalists and those seeking the ease of an automatic. The front-wheel drive design is standard across all powertrains, ensuring stability and smooth handling in urban environments. The Citan’s dual-clutch automatic transmission offers seamless gear shifts, providing drivers with an elevated driving experience. In contrast, the Kangoo’s emphasis on efficiency includes a practical manual gearbox tailored for everyday utility.
Efficiency is a key consideration for these vehicles. The Citan reports consumption between 5.3 and 7.1 liters/100 km for internal combustion engines and as low as 19.3 kWh/100 km for electric variants. The Kangoo counters with fuel consumption figures of 4.9 to 7.0 liters/100 km and electric consumption starting at 18.4 kWh/100 km. Both models contribute to reducing carbon footprints, with the Citan achieving CO2 efficiency classes from A to F, similar to the Kangoo.
Inside, the Mercedes Citan comfortably seats up to five passengers and offers a generous trunk capacity of up to 551 liters, adequate for both commercial and everyday use. The Renault Kangoo prioritizes cargo space, with a payload capacity ranging from 508 to 767 kg, thanks to its focus on maximizing internal space for goods rather than passengers, typically seating just two.
Choosing between the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter largely depends on the specific requirements of potential buyers. The Citan excels with its luxury touches and versatility, making it a strong contender for business owners seeking a blend of prestige and functionality. Meanwhile, the Kangoo stands out for businesses focused on logistics and transport, offering larger cargo capacities and robust practicality.
In the end, both these vehicles demonstrate remarkable innovations and capabilities within the compact transport sector, ensuring that regardless of the choice, buyers can expect dependability, efficiency, and modern technology from either option.
Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £, while the Mercedes Citan costs 22400 £. That’s a price difference of around 3 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van manages with 5.10 L and is therefore hardly any more efficient than the Mercedes Citan with 5.20 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Renault Kangoo Compact Van: with 18.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Mercedes Citan with 19.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.60 kWh.
As for range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 290 km, about 10 km more than the Mercedes Citan.
Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Citan has a barely noticeable edge – offering 131 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 11.60 s, while the Mercedes Citan takes 13 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes Citan performs barely noticeable better – reaching 183 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 270 Nm.
Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is barely noticeable lighter – 1493 kg compared to 1556 kg. The difference is around 63 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs distinctly better – up to 4900 L, which is about 1240 L more than the Mercedes Citan.
When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo Compact Van distinctly takes the win – 901 kg compared to 644 kg. That’s a difference of about 257 kg.
All in all, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It impresses with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile companion for everyday use.
The Mercedes-Benz Citan High Roof Van is a versatile option in the compact van segment, offering a perfect blend of practicality and style. Its sleek design combined with the brand's hallmark attention to detail ensures that it stands out on city streets and motorways alike. Inside, the spacious cabin provides ample room for passengers or cargo, making it an ideal choice for both urban professionals and families seeking flexibility.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a versatile small van that seamlessly blends practicality with modern design. It offers a spacious interior, making it ideal for transporting goods or passengers while maintaining a compact exterior for easy manoeuvrability in urban settings. Equipped with efficient engines, the Kangoo balances performance with economy, catering to the diverse needs of businesses and individual users alike.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22400 - 30100 £
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 280 km
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 167 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1556 - 2010 kg
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1811 - 1830 mm
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 - 3660 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
485 - 644 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 - 15.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2021 - 2024
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.