Two cars, one duel: Ford Tourneo Connect meets Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £, while the Ford Tourneo Connect costs 27300 £. That’s a price difference of around 4902 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Tourneo Connect manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.10 L. The difference is about 4.60 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs significantly better – achieving up to 290 km, about 171 km more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Connect has a a bit edge – offering 150 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Tourneo Connect is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 10.10 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.60 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Tourneo Connect performs barely noticeable better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Tourneo Connect pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 350 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is barely noticeable lighter – 1493 kg compared to 1542 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs clearly perceptible better – up to 4900 L, which is about 1795 L more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.
When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo Compact Van minimal takes the win – 901 kg compared to 818 kg. That’s a difference of about 83 kg.
Overall, the Ford Tourneo Connect shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Ford Tourneo Connect represents a versatile option in the people carrier segment, offering a blend of functionality and comfort for family or business use. Its design combines modern aesthetics with the practicality needed for daily operations, making it an appealing choice for those seeking a reliable and adaptable vehicle. Inside, the Tourneo Connect provides a spacious and well-thought-out interior, ensuring a comfortable driving experience for both driver and passengers.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a versatile small van that seamlessly blends practicality with modern design. It offers a spacious interior, making it ideal for transporting goods or passengers while maintaining a compact exterior for easy manoeuvrability in urban settings. Equipped with efficient engines, the Kangoo balances performance with economy, catering to the diverse needs of businesses and individual users alike.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27300 - 41900 £
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1542 - 1781 kg
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1213 - 1720 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4500 - 4868 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1855 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1833 mm
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2556 - 3105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.