VS

Ford Tourneo Connect vs Peugeot Rifter comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 22,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Peugeot Rifter?

Ford Tourneo Connect vs Peugeot Rifter: Key differences

Ford Tourneo Connect

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Peugeot Rifter

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Tourneo Connect

Ford Tourneo Connect VS Peugeot Rifter — direct comparison for practical buyers

Ford Tourneo Connect and Peugeot Rifter arrive at the same brief — big interior in compact exterior dimensions — but they answer it in different tones. The Tourneo Connect feels like a work‑aware family van: brutally practical, very roomy and designed around loading and harnessing gear. The Rifter reads as a softer, more user‑friendly people‑carrier with better outward visibility and intuitive daily controls. This page compares how those personalities translate to real life: driving feel, cabin comfort, family usability, city versus motorway behavior and ownership trade‑offs. Read on to see which temperament matches your daily routine rather than just which spec sheet looks better.

Rifter

Character and driving: purposeful versus placid

The Ford Tourneo Connect drives with a purposeful, utility-first demeanour that rewards hauling and long runs — it steers with precision and feels planted, especially when you need the reserves. The Peugeot Rifter trades that plantedness for a gentler, more relaxed ride that masks potholes well in town but shows more body roll at higher speeds. If you value a tauter, more assured feel when overtaking or loaded, the Tourneo Connect will feel more confident; if you prefer cruising around the high street and prioritise comfort over agility, the Rifter’s softer setup is easier on the nerves. Both can feel noisy on fast open roads thanks to their boxy shapes, but the way that noise arrives differs: the Tourneo’s is more workmanlike, the Rifter’s more soporific.

Tourneo Connect

Comfort and cabin feel: functional Ford, friendlier Peugeot

Inside, the Tourneo Connect emphasises durability and utility with plentiful hard plastics and a straightforward layout that can look a bit commercial. The Peugeot Rifter also relies on robust materials, but its seating position, visibility and small user-focused touches give the cabin a more welcoming atmosphere. Infotainment is a notable contrast: the Ford uses a familiar but fiddly control logic that can frustrate at night, while the Rifter’s updated screen and clearer physical controls feel easier to operate in daily life. Neither car competes with premium MPVs for soft-touch surfaces, but the Rifter’s ergonomics and sightlines make longer stints feel less wearing.

Rifter

Practicality and family usability: three across and different compromises

Both cars are family workhorses that can take three child seats across the middle row, but they go about it differently: the Tourneo Connect offers a very wide bench and an especially capacious load bay that suits bulky kit and awkward items. The Peugeot Rifter answers with three individual sliding second‑row seats and clever everyday touches like an opening tailgate glass that speed up simple chores. Removing and stowing seats is generally easier in the Rifter, while the Tourneo rewards you with greater absolute cargo volume and loading ease. If your life is bikes, sports kit and occasional adult passengers in the third row, the Tourneo Connect leans practical; if you want flexible seating for everyday family shuttles and frequent in‑town loading, the Rifter is tidier.

Tourneo Connect

City friendliness vs long‑distance behavior: urban ease against motorway composure

In built-up areas the Peugeot Rifter feels naturally at home: light steering, big windows and helpful cameras make parking and tight manoeuvres painless, and the electric versions shine for short daily trips. The Ford Tourneo Connect is still competent in the city — its sliding doors and generous mirrors help — but its width and large tailgate demand more space to operate. On longer stretches the Tourneo’s composed chassis and available hybridised powertrain give it an advantage when you need sustained pace and load-hauling capability. The Rifter is comfortable on regional runs but reveals its limits at sustained motorway speeds, where range and wind noise become more noticeable.

Rifter

Perceived quality, running costs and which buyer each suits

Perceived quality is similar: both cabins prioritise robustness over refinement, yet the Tourneo Connect leans utilitarian while the Rifter manages a slightly more considered everyday ambience. Running costs diverge depending on use — the Rifter’s electric focus can be very cheap in urban commuting, while the Tourneo’s plug‑in option rewards regular charging and can extend real‑world range for mixed duties. For buyers who need maximum usable space, towing or frequent long journeys with heavy loads, the Ford Tourneo Connect maps better to those priorities; for families who spend most time in town, want easier seat manipulation and a gentler ride, the Peugeot Rifter will often feel like the smarter daily choice. The next section drills into technical differences so you can translate these real‑world impressions into concrete equipment, economy and performance trade‑offs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tourneo Connect

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot Rifter is a bit cheaper – starting at 22,900 £ , while the Ford Tourneo Connect costs 27,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,482 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.9 L/100km.

Rifter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers moderately more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Tourneo Connect is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 10.1 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 11.3 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Connect delivers a bit more torque with 350 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Tourneo Connect

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Rifter is very slightly lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 1,542 kg. The difference is around 44 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers clearly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 1,050 L. That’s a difference of about 670 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries only slightly more – 818 kg compared to 814 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Tourneo Connect is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,300
Tourneo Connect

Ford Tourneo Connect

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 116 - 119 km
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot Rifter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Tourneo Connect

The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.

details

Peugeot Rifter

The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.

details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot Rifter

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
Price
22,900 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
11 - 164 g/km
co2
142 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,694 kg
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
Trunk capacity
322 - 1,050 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,855 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
563 - 818 kg
Payload
518 - 814 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Power HP
102 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Power kW
75 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
Brand
Ford
Brand
Peugeot
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.