Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQS SUV vs Renault Mégane comparison
Compare performance (658 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (95,000 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Renault Mégane?
EQS SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Mégane is substantially cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 59,915 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Mégane is noticeably more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 19.6 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQS SUV. That’s a difference of about 4.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 243 km more than the Renault Mégane.
Mégane
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers considerably more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 440 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Renault Mégane takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Mégane tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 650 Nm more.
EQS SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Mégane is substantially lighter – 1,719 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 976 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers markedly more boot space – 645 L compared to 389 L. That’s a difference of about 256 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers visibly more capacity – up to 2,100 L, about 768 L more than the Renault Mégane.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS SUV carries noticeably more – 570 kg compared to 446 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS SUV stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £95,000
Mercedes EQS SUV
Mercedes EQS SUV
Renault Mégane
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Renault Mégane
The Renault Mégane blends Gallic flair with practical everyday charm, showing that sensible transport can still have personality and poise. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want a comfortable, stylish hatchback that feels a little more special than the usual commute companion.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
Renault Mégane
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
|
Price
35,100 - 38,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
Electric Range
452 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
|
Curb weight
1,719 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
389 L
|
|
Length
5,125 mm
|
Length
4,200 mm
|
|
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
|
Width
1,783 mm
|
|
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,332 L
|
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Payload
446 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.