Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs MG Marvel R comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 288 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 40,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or MG Marvel R?
Mercedes EQT vs MG Marvel R: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQT is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the MG Marvel R costs 40,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,503 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MG Marvel R is marginally more efficient: consuming 19.4 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the MG Marvel R offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 124 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Marvel R
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG Marvel R offers considerably more power – delivering 288 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 166 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Marvel R is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 7.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the MG Marvel R is visibly faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 68 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Marvel R delivers significantly more torque with 665 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 420 Nm more.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG Marvel R is barely lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers markedly more boot space – 551 L compared to 357 L. That’s a difference of about 194 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQT offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,979 L, about 583 L more than the MG Marvel R.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries barely more – 531 kg compared to 478 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MG Marvel R holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,300
MG Marvel R
Mercedes EQT
MG Marvel R
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
MG Marvel R
The MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.
details
Mercedes EQT
MG Marvel R
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
357 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,674 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,919 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
453 - 478 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2021
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
MG
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.