Compare performance (435 HP vs 288 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 40,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG4 or MG Marvel R?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The world of electric vehicles has expanded, offering enticing options for those seeking a greener drive. Two notable contenders in the MG lineup, the MG4 and MG Marvel R, present distinct features tailored to different lifestyles. Join us as we explore these two electric marvels, unveiling their unique offerings and technological innovations.
The MG4 and the Marvel R cater to distinct design preferences. The MG4, classified as a hatchback, boasts dimensions of 4287 mm in length, 1836 mm in width, and a height of 1504 to 1516 mm. This compact silhouette is perfect for urban driving and appeals to those who prefer a more compact vehicle without sacrificing interior space.
In contrast, the MG Marvel R emerges as a formidable SUV, offering greater road presence with its dimensions of 4674 mm in length, 1919 mm in width, and 1613 mm in height. Those looking for a commanding driving position and ample cargo space will find the Marvel R a worthy choice.
The MG4 comes in various power options, ranging from 170 HP to an impressive 435 HP, with rear-wheel and all-wheel drive variants. Its acceleration prowess is evident, achieving 0-100 km/h in as quick as 3.8 seconds, making it a formidable contender for enthusiasts.
The Marvel R, meanwhile, offers choices between 180 HP and 288 HP, paired with either rear-wheel or all-wheel drive. Although slightly less powerful in its top variant compared to the MG4, the Marvel R still impresses with strong performance statistics, reaching 0-100 km/h in 4.9 seconds.
The MG4 proves to be a remarkable long-haul companion, offering an electric range between 350 km and 520 km, attributed to its battery capacity options of 49 kWh, 59.5 kWh, and 74.4 kWh. Its consumption varies between 16 and 18.7 kWh/100 km, earning it the CO2 Efficiency Class A.
On the other hand, the Marvel R comes equipped with a 66.1 kWh battery, delivering a range of up to 402 km. While its consumption of 19.4 to 20.9 kWh/100 km is slightly higher, it sustains an efficient drive for those seeking space and power in an SUV form.
Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers but offer varying trunk capacities. The MG4 presents a trunk space between 350 L and 363 L, suitable for daily errands and modest luggage capacity.
The Marvel R offers a slightly more confined trunk capacity of 357 L, yet compensates with a roomy interior that ensures passenger comfort. Both models reflect their design intents, combining practical space with modern electric advancements.
Ultimately, the decision between the MG4 and the Marvel R lies in personal preference and lifestyle requirements. The MG4 is ideal for those valuing performance and compact design, while the Marvel R caters to buyers in need of SUV road dominance and interior spaciousness. Both vehicles represent MG's commitment to innovation and electrification, setting a standard for future automotive progress.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG MG4 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the MG Marvel R costs 40,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,429 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MG MG4 is noticeably more efficient: consuming 16.1 kWh/100km compared to 19.4 kWh/100km for the MG Marvel R. That’s a difference of about 3.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the MG MG4 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 545 km, about 143 km more than the MG Marvel R.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG4 offers clearly more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 288 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG4 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the MG Marvel R takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Marvel R delivers very slightly more torque with 665 Nm compared to 600 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MG4 is marginally lighter – 1,755 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG Marvel R carries marginally more – 478 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
The MG MG4 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG4 is a sprightly electric hatch that marries bold, modern looks with genuinely useful practicality, making it a great everyday companion for city and weekend life alike. Inside it surprises with a smart, user-friendly cabin and an engaging drive that delivers more personality than you might expect for the price.
details
The MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 40,300 £
|
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 19 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
405 - 545 km
|
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,755 - 1,810 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
357 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,674 mm
|
|
Width
1,836 mm
|
Width
1,919 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
|
|
Payload
448 kg
|
Payload
453 - 478 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 435 HP
|
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 600 Nm
|
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 320 kW
|
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2021
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España