VS

Ford Puma vs MG MG4 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG MG4?

Ford Puma vs MG MG4: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly lighter

MG MG4

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • only slightly more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Puma

City Swagger vs Silent Composure

The Puma arrives with a cheeky, urban attitude — light on its feet, easy to tuck into tight parking spots and quick to respond to small steering inputs, which makes it a natural for city life. The MG4 counters with a calm, planted demeanor that soothes miles of traffic, giving you the sense that long commutes are something it was built to absorb. Each car speaks a different language: one playful and nimble, the other deliberate and composed, so your daily route will decide which tone you prefer.

MG4

When the Motorway Turns into a Living Room

On longer stretches the MG4 impresses with a relaxed, steady presence that keeps fatigue at bay and cabin noise low, ideal for those who value serenity on extended trips. The Puma keeps things engaging with a livelier character that rewards steering inputs and feels more alert when the road gets twisty, offering a sportier sort of comfort. Choose between serene stability and animated involvement depending on whether you prioritise hush or hoot.

Puma

Packing, Practicality and Real-Life Usability

Practicality is where the two diverge in useful ways: the Puma leans on clever storage touches and an easy-going layout that makes everyday loading painless, while the MG4 stretches cargo flexibility in a way that appeals to weekend escape artists. Interior ergonomics in the Puma are straightforward and friendly, whereas the MG4’s layout feels designed around a modern, streamlined life where technology takes centre stage. Families and frequent carriers will find reasons to favour either approach based on what they stow and how often.

MG4

How They Feel Behind the Wheel

Steering in the Puma is engaging with a hint of sportiness; the chassis encourages a bit of driver involvement and rewards enthusiastic cornering without feeling rude. The MG4 trades that driver-centric vibe for a more composed, glued-to-the-road sensation that inspires confidence at speed and makes effortless progress feel effortless. Both deliver comfort, but they package it very differently — one with a wink, the other with a calm smile.

Puma

Cabin Character and Everyday Tech

Step inside the Puma and you find a friendly, tactile environment with controls that are simple to use and surfaces that tend toward practicality over flash, which is a plus for usability-minded buyers. The MG4 presents a sleeker, more digital-forward cabin that feels modern and a touch futuristic, appealing to those who like minimalist design and up-to-date connectivity. It’s a choice between familiar convenience and a more forward-looking interior mood.

MG4

Which Shopper Will Each Car Charm?

If your life revolves around city runs, parking ease and a fun-to-drive personality, the Puma will likely make you smile every morning; if your priorities are serene long-distance runs, efficient use of space and a modern electric-leaning vibe, the MG4 will speak to you. Both are compelling for different reasons, so think about where you do most of your driving and what type of cabin atmosphere you enjoy, then read on — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG4
BYD Atto 2
VS
Think of the MG4 as the affordable hot hatch of the EV world — compact, sharp-handling and great value for drivers who want a little grin in every corner, while the BYD Atto 2 is a chilled crossover, taller, roomier and packed with clever tech and impressive real-world range. If you want lively …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the MG MG4 costs 30,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,634 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is visibly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the MG MG4. That’s a difference of about 3.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the MG MG4 offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 450 km, about 33 km more than the Ford Puma.

MG4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG4 offers a bit more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG4 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
MG MG4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG MG4

The MG4 is a sprightly electric hatch that marries bold, modern looks with genuinely useful practicality, making it a great everyday companion for city and weekend life alike. Inside it surprises with a smart, user-friendly cabin and an engaging drive that delivers more personality than you might expect for the price.

details
MG.027.STUDIO
MG.028.STUDIO
MG.036.STUDIO
MG.038_0.STUDIO

Reviews MG MG4

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Angio
12 Jan 2026, 12:26:30

Superb

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sal
23 Oct 2025, 20:41:36

I tried it today and found the car genuinely pleasant and comfortable to drive.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
MG MG4
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG4 is a zippy compact EV that fizzes through town with sharp handling, clever packaging and an attractive price — perfect if you want fun, efficiency and a bit of character in your daily commute. By contrast the MG MGS5 EV trades some of that cheeky agility for a taller, more spacious and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
Ford Puma
MG MG4

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
30,500 - 36,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
330 - 450 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,695 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,836 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
389 - 449 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
170 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
125 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.