VS

Ford Puma vs MG MG4 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 30500 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG MG4?

Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate

MG MG4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the MG MG4 costs 30500 £. That’s a price difference of around 5777 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the MG MG4 with 16.40 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.30 kWh.

As for range, the MG MG4 performs slightly better – achieving up to 450 km, about 74 km more than the Ford Puma.

MG4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG4 has a to a small extent edge – offering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG4 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.10 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the MG MG4 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1635 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 363 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG MG4 performs evident better – up to 1765 L, which is about 482 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be has the upper hand and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
Ford Puma
MG MG4

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

2 (7 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

MG MG4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The MG4 is a sprightly electric hatch that marries bold, modern looks with genuinely useful practicality, making it a great everyday companion for city and weekend life alike. Inside it surprises with a smart, user-friendly cabin and an engaging drive that delivers more personality than you might expect for the price.

details
Ford Puma
MG MG4
Puma
MG4

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
30500 - 36500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
330 - 450 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
49 - 61.7 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1635 - 1695 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 363 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4287 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1836 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1504 - 1516 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1165 - 1765 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
389 - 449 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
170 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
125 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.