VS

Ford Puma vs MG MG4 – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or MG MG4 fits your lifestyle better.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

City Swagger vs Silent Composure

The Puma arrives with a cheeky, urban attitude — light on its feet, easy to tuck into tight parking spots and quick to respond to small steering inputs, which makes it a natural for city life. The MG4 counters with a calm, planted demeanor that soothes miles of traffic, giving you the sense that long commutes are something it was built to absorb. Each car speaks a different language: one playful and nimble, the other deliberate and composed, so your daily route will decide which tone you prefer.

MG4 @ news.mgmotor.eu

When the Motorway Turns into a Living Room

On longer stretches the MG4 impresses with a relaxed, steady presence that keeps fatigue at bay and cabin noise low, ideal for those who value serenity on extended trips. The Puma keeps things engaging with a livelier character that rewards steering inputs and feels more alert when the road gets twisty, offering a sportier sort of comfort. Choose between serene stability and animated involvement depending on whether you prioritise hush or hoot.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Packing, Practicality and Real-Life Usability

Practicality is where the two diverge in useful ways: the Puma leans on clever storage touches and an easy-going layout that makes everyday loading painless, while the MG4 stretches cargo flexibility in a way that appeals to weekend escape artists. Interior ergonomics in the Puma are straightforward and friendly, whereas the MG4’s layout feels designed around a modern, streamlined life where technology takes centre stage. Families and frequent carriers will find reasons to favour either approach based on what they stow and how often.

MG4 @ news.mgmotor.eu

How They Feel Behind the Wheel

Steering in the Puma is engaging with a hint of sportiness; the chassis encourages a bit of driver involvement and rewards enthusiastic cornering without feeling rude. The MG4 trades that driver-centric vibe for a more composed, glued-to-the-road sensation that inspires confidence at speed and makes effortless progress feel effortless. Both deliver comfort, but they package it very differently — one with a wink, the other with a calm smile.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Cabin Character and Everyday Tech

Step inside the Puma and you find a friendly, tactile environment with controls that are simple to use and surfaces that tend toward practicality over flash, which is a plus for usability-minded buyers. The MG4 presents a sleeker, more digital-forward cabin that feels modern and a touch futuristic, appealing to those who like minimalist design and up-to-date connectivity. It’s a choice between familiar convenience and a more forward-looking interior mood.

MG4 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Which Shopper Will Each Car Charm?

If your life revolves around city runs, parking ease and a fun-to-drive personality, the Puma will likely make you smile every morning; if your priorities are serene long-distance runs, efficient use of space and a modern electric-leaning vibe, the MG4 will speak to you. Both are compelling for different reasons, so think about where you do most of your driving and what type of cabin atmosphere you enjoy, then read on — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the MG MG4 costs 30500 £. That’s a price difference of around 5777 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the MG MG4 with 16.40 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.30 kWh.

As for range, the MG MG4 performs slightly better – achieving up to 450 km, about 74 km more than the Ford Puma.

MG4 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG4 has a to a small extent edge – offering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG4 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.10 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the MG MG4 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1635 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 363 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG MG4 performs evident better – up to 1765 L, which is about 482 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be has the upper hand and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

MG MG4

5 (1)
rate

The MG MG4 stands out in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and competitive pricing. It offers an impressive blend of advanced technology and practicality, making it a strong contender for eco-conscious drivers. The interior is both spacious and comfortable, providing a pleasant driving experience for both short commutes and longer journeys.

details
MG.027.STUDIO @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG.028.STUDIO @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG.036.STUDIO @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG.038_0.STUDIO @ news.mgmotor.eu

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
MG MG4
MG MGS5 EV
VS
In the realm of cutting-edge electric vehicles, the MG4 and the MG5 EV stand as two competitive yet distinct offerings from the MG lineup. The MG4, with its sporty hatchback design, appeals to those seeking agility and a modern aesthetic, while the MG5 EV, as a station wagon, offers a more practical approach with generous cargo space and versatility for family use. Both models boast impressive ranges and advanced technological features, making them strong contenders in the rapidly growing EV market.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
Puma
MG4

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
30500 - 36500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
330 - 450 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
49 - 61.7 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1635 - 1695 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 363 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4287 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1836 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1504 - 1516 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1165 - 1765 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
389 - 449 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
170 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
125 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
MG MG4
BYD Atto 2
VS
In the competitive EV market, the MG MG4 stands out with its stylish design and impressive driving range, positioning itself as a strong contender against the BYD Atto 2. While the MG4 boasts sharp handling and a well-appointed interior, the Atto 2 impresses with its robust performance and spacious layout, making it ideal for families. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, providing a compelling choice for eco-conscious drivers seeking value and innovation.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Ford Puma
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing between these two vehicles may come down to personal preference, as both offer unique strengths tailored to different driving tastes.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.