@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Kia Corporation
VS

Ford Puma vs Kia XCeed – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Kia XCeed fits your lifestyle better.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The Battle of the Subcompact SUVs: Ford Puma vs. Kia XCeed

In the automotive world, subcompact SUVs have carved a niche for themselves, offering the rugged appeal of SUVs while maintaining the nimbleness of smaller cars. Two prominent contenders in this category are the Ford Puma and the Kia XCeed. Both vehicles promise a blend of style, efficiency, and performance, making them strong contenders for anyone looking to buy a car in this segment. Let's take a closer look at how these two models stack up against each other.

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Puma boasts a sleek and compact design, with dimensions measuring between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and a height of 1550 mm to 1555 mm. On the other hand, the Kia XCeed, slightly longer, stretches out to 4395 mm in length, 1826 mm in width, and stands at a height of 1495 mm. This makes the XCeed a bit more expansive but lower to the ground compared to the Puma.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance

Under the hood, the Ford Puma offers diverse powertrains, featuring a petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) option and a fully electric variant. The power output ranges from 125 HP to 168 HP, with a torque between 170 Nm and 290 Nm. In contrast, the Kia XCeed is powered by a traditional petrol engine, providing options between 100 HP and 140 HP and a torque range of 172 Nm to 253 Nm.

Regarding acceleration, the Puma can sprint from 0-100 km/h between 7.4 and 9.8 seconds, whereas the XCeed does it in 10.2 to 13.4 seconds, giving the Puma a noticeable edge in terms of sheer acceleration boost.

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Fuel Efficiency and Range

The Puma offers a competitive edge with its hybrid and electric drive capabilities. It boasts fuel consumption of 5.4 to 6 L/100km in the petrol MHEV variant and a consumption of 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km for the electric version. With an electric range of up to 376 km and a battery capacity of 43 kWh, the Puma provides flexibility for both short-city commutes and longer journeys.

Meanwhile, the Kia XCeed, equipped solely with petrol engines, records consumption rates between 6.3 and 6.5 L/100km. Although not an eco-warrior in terms of emissions when compared to Puma’s hybrid variations, it offers reliability and familiarity in its traditional combustion setup.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Interior and Cargo Space

Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, suitable for small families or group outings. In terms of cargo space, the Puma provides a trunk capacity of between 456 L and 523 L, offering more versatility for carrying luggage or groceries. The XCeed, while generous, offers slightly less at 426 L of trunk capacity.

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Technology and Features

The Ford Puma is equipped with modern driving aids and infotainment options such as advanced sync systems, offering seamless integration with smartphones for navigation, music, and driving data. Its innovative hybrid systems also feature smart regenerative braking to optimize energy use.

Conversely, the Kia XCeed mirrors many of these technological offerings but leans more toward user-friendly interfaces and robust safety systems, ensuring a safe ride with lane-keeping assistance and adaptive cruise control among others.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion

The battle between the Ford Puma and Kia XCeed is a close one, with each car showcasing unique strengths. The Puma's innovative hybrid system and electric variant offer cutting-edge technology, making it the ideal choice for environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the XCeed's simplicity, reliability in performance, and slightly greater dimensions provide a spacious and user-friendly drive.

Whether prioritizing fuel efficiency and cutting-edge green technology in the Puma or leaning toward the traditional reliability and slightly more space in the XCeed, both cars represent top choices in the subcompact SUV category.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia XCeed has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1637 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 180 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 210 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is hardly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1351 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more room – 523 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia XCeed performs slight better – up to 1378 L, which is about 95 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed barely noticeable takes the win – 479 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Kia XCeed proves to be wins solidly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Kia XCeed is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £23,100
XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Kia XCeed

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.4 - 6.8 L
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Kia XCeed

Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.

details
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_25 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_08 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_21 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_57 @ Kia Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
23100 - 33000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
144 - 155 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1351 - 1419 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
426 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1826 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1483 - 1495 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1378 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
471 - 479 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 11.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Kia

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Ceed
@ Kia Corporation
Kia XCeed
VS
If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Stonic
@ Kia Corporation
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Kia Corporation
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.