Compare performance (168 HP vs 90 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 20100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Hyundai Bayon?
The world of compact SUVs is increasingly competitive, and two models stand out in this bustling segment: the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Bayon. Both vehicles represent the perfect blend of style, innovation, and practicality. This article delves into the technical intricacies and standout features of each, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Ford Puma offers a choice between multiple energetic petrol MHEV (mild hybrid electric vehicles) and fully electric options, ranging from 125 to 168 horsepower. This diverse power lineup ensures there is a Puma for everyone, whether you're looking for eco-friendly electric power or peppy petrol performance. The Puma's diverse powertrain options translate to impressive acceleration figures, with the fastest variant managing 0-100 km/h in just 7.4 seconds. Depending on the engine configuration, drivers can enjoy a comfortable max speed of up to 210 km/h.
In comparison, the Hyundai Bayon is powered by a reliable 1.0-liter petrol engine producing 100 horsepower. What it lacks in raw power compared to the Puma, it compensates for with impressive fuel efficiency, consuming just 5.4 L/100km. The Bayon accelerates from 0-100 km/h in up to 12.4 seconds, which suits many everyday driving scenarios, especially urban commuting, perfectly.
Both the Puma and the Bayon offer excellent practicality, with seating for five passengers and ample trunk space. The Puma stands out with a trunk capacity that can expand up to 523 liters, making it exceptionally functional for family outings or long road trips.
While the Bayon's total length is slightly less at 4180 mm compared to Puma's 4226 mm, it remains an ideal size for navigating through busy city streets. With a curb weight ranging between 1170 to 1195 kg, the Bayon is lighter than Puma, which potentially enhances maneuverability and ease of parking.
Both vehicles present competitive environmental credentials. The Ford Puma offers different configurations including an electric variant boasting an impressive range of 376 km and an efficiency class rating as high as 'A'. Ford clearly prioritizes innovation in reducing emissions with its electrification options.
On the other side, Hyundai keeps things simple with the Bayon's petrol engine. Achieving a CO2 emission of 122 g/km and an efficiency class of 'D', the Bayon ensures modest emissions without sacrificing everyday practicality and ease of ownership.
Looking at advancements, the Ford Puma is laden with technology catering to modern-day demands, such as multiple transmission options (Manual, Dual-Clutch Automatic, and Reduction Gearbox), sophisticated hybrid systems, and advanced digital cockpit features. These offerings signify Ford's commitment to delivering a futuristic driving experience.
The Hyundai Bayon incorporates Hyundai’s well-regarded technology package, including an intuitive infotainment system and smart connectivity features. While it does not offer hybrid options, its emphasis on straightforward technology showcases Hyundai's commitment to practicality and reliability.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Bayon primarily depends on personal preferences and requirements. For those interested in a versatile vehicle with multiple engine options, cutting-edge technology, and an electrification path, the Ford Puma is an enticing option. On the other hand, the Hyundai Bayon offers a straightforward, efficient, and highly reliable package that promises to meet the daily demands of most urban dwellers without breaking the bank.
Ultimately, both the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Bayon excel in their own rights, making them formidable opponents in the field of compact SUVs, each with its own recipe for success.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Hyundai Bayon has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Hyundai Bayon with 5.80 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a significantly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 90 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Hyundai Bayon takes 11.90 s. That’s about 4.50 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls significantly stronger with 290 Nm compared to 172 Nm. That’s about 118 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Hyundai Bayon is to a small extent lighter – 1175 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 141 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers minimal more room – 456 L compared to 411 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The Hyundai Bayon slips neatly between city runabout and small SUV, offering surprising practicality and a fresh, confident design that stands out in urban traffic. It's an easy buy for shoppers who want smart packaging, tidy handling and a dash of personality without fuss — a sensible little crossover that makes everyday driving a bit more enjoyable.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
20100 - 25800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
130 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1175 - 1200 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 L
|
Trunk capacity
411 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1775 mm
|
|
Height
1550 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
450 - 460 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
90 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
172 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
66 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España