@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Hyundai Motor Company
VS

Ford Puma vs Hyundai Bayon – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Hyundai Bayon fits your lifestyle better.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Urban Adventures: Ford Puma vs Hyundai Bayon

The world of compact SUVs is increasingly competitive, and two models stand out in this bustling segment: the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Bayon. Both vehicles represent the perfect blend of style, innovation, and practicality. This article delves into the technical intricacies and standout features of each, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.

Bayon @ Hyundai Motor Company

Performance and Power

The Ford Puma offers a choice between multiple energetic petrol MHEV (mild hybrid electric vehicles) and fully electric options, ranging from 125 to 168 horsepower. This diverse power lineup ensures there is a Puma for everyone, whether you're looking for eco-friendly electric power or peppy petrol performance. The Puma's diverse powertrain options translate to impressive acceleration figures, with the fastest variant managing 0-100 km/h in just 7.4 seconds. Depending on the engine configuration, drivers can enjoy a comfortable max speed of up to 210 km/h.

In comparison, the Hyundai Bayon is powered by a reliable 1.0-liter petrol engine producing 100 horsepower. What it lacks in raw power compared to the Puma, it compensates for with impressive fuel efficiency, consuming just 5.4 L/100km. The Bayon accelerates from 0-100 km/h in up to 12.4 seconds, which suits many everyday driving scenarios, especially urban commuting, perfectly.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Dimensions and Practicality

Both the Puma and the Bayon offer excellent practicality, with seating for five passengers and ample trunk space. The Puma stands out with a trunk capacity that can expand up to 523 liters, making it exceptionally functional for family outings or long road trips.

While the Bayon's total length is slightly less at 4180 mm compared to Puma's 4226 mm, it remains an ideal size for navigating through busy city streets. With a curb weight ranging between 1170 to 1195 kg, the Bayon is lighter than Puma, which potentially enhances maneuverability and ease of parking.

Bayon @ Hyundai Motor Company

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Considerations

Both vehicles present competitive environmental credentials. The Ford Puma offers different configurations including an electric variant boasting an impressive range of 376 km and an efficiency class rating as high as 'A'. Ford clearly prioritizes innovation in reducing emissions with its electrification options.

On the other side, Hyundai keeps things simple with the Bayon's petrol engine. Achieving a CO2 emission of 122 g/km and an efficiency class of 'D', the Bayon ensures modest emissions without sacrificing everyday practicality and ease of ownership.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Technology and Innovations

Looking at advancements, the Ford Puma is laden with technology catering to modern-day demands, such as multiple transmission options (Manual, Dual-Clutch Automatic, and Reduction Gearbox), sophisticated hybrid systems, and advanced digital cockpit features. These offerings signify Ford's commitment to delivering a futuristic driving experience.

The Hyundai Bayon incorporates Hyundai’s well-regarded technology package, including an intuitive infotainment system and smart connectivity features. While it does not offer hybrid options, its emphasis on straightforward technology showcases Hyundai's commitment to practicality and reliability.

Bayon @ Hyundai Motor Company

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Bayon primarily depends on personal preferences and requirements. For those interested in a versatile vehicle with multiple engine options, cutting-edge technology, and an electrification path, the Ford Puma is an enticing option. On the other hand, the Hyundai Bayon offers a straightforward, efficient, and highly reliable package that promises to meet the daily demands of most urban dwellers without breaking the bank.

Ultimately, both the Ford Puma and the Hyundai Bayon excel in their own rights, making them formidable opponents in the field of compact SUVs, each with its own recipe for success.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Hyundai Bayon has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4714 £.

Both cars consume an average of 5.40 L per 100 km – no difference here.

Bayon @ Hyundai Motor Company

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a significantly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 100 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Hyundai Bayon takes 11.30 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Hyundai Bayon tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Hyundai Bayon is to a small extent lighter – 1170 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 146 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 411 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs barely noticeable better – up to 1283 L, which is about 78 L more than the Hyundai Bayon.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon slips neatly between city runabout and small SUV, offering surprising practicality and a fresh, confident design that stands out in urban traffic. It's an easy buy for shoppers who want smart packaging, tidy handling and a dash of personality without fuss — a sensible little crossover that makes everyday driving a bit more enjoyable.

details
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Bayon @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
20100 - 25800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
124 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1170 - 1195 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
411 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4180 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1775 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1500 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1205 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
460 - 465 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
100 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 12.4 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
176 - 179 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
74 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
998 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Hyundai
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.