Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs VW T-Roc - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 26400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW T-Roc?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1667 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
T-Roc
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a a bit edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs barely noticeable better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 149 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.
In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs minimal better – up to 1350 L, which is about 67 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc barely noticeable takes the win – 515 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
VW T-Roc
5 (3 Reviews)
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
26400 - 38600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4373 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1573 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
196 - 212 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.