@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Ford Puma vs VW T-Roc – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Puma?

Up to 168 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Puma according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Ford Puma consumes 5.40 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Ford Puma use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Ford Puma requires 13.10 kWh.

Q: What is the Ford Puma’s maximum WLTP range?

The WLTP range is up to 376 km.

Q: What is the battery capacity of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma comes with a 43 kWh battery.

Q: What is the top speed of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma reaches up to 210 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Puma’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Ford Puma is 4214 mm long, 1805 mm wide and 1555 mm high.

Q: Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the VW T-Roc's engine?

The VW T-Roc reaches a peak output of 150 HP, depending on the model.

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW T-Roc?

scroll down

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Dynamic Duo: Comparing the Ford Puma and VW T-Roc

The automotive world is witnessing an intense showdown between two compact SUVs: the Ford Puma and the VW T-Roc. These vehicles, bold in their presence and performance, cater to an audience looking for efficient, versatile, and technologically advanced driving experiences. In this article, we'll delve into the technical aspects and innovations of these two popular models.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Power & Performance

The Ford Puma offers a variety of engines, from the efficient 125 HP petrol mild-hybrid to the advanced fully electric version providing up to 160 HP. With a responsive choice of manual or dual-clutch automatic transmissions, the Puma emphasizes versatility. In terms of acceleration, the Puma reaches 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds, offering spirited driving dynamics.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc presents both petrol and diesel engine options. The spectrum ranges from a practical 115 HP petrol variant to a robust 300 HP engine for those who crave greater power. With both front-wheel and all-wheel-drive options available, the T-Roc caters to a wider range of driving preferences. It manages acceleration figures as quick as 4.9 seconds for a sportier drive, particularly in the performance-focused 300 HP variant.

scroll down

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fuel Efficiency and Eco-Friendliness

Fuel economy plays a pivotal role in the appeal of both models. The Ford Puma's petrol engines boast fuel efficiencies ranging from 5.4 to 6.0 L/100 km, depending on the powertrain. Its electric variant shines with consumption figures as low as 13.1 kWh/100 km and an electric range of up to 376 km, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers.

The VW T-Roc holds its ground with practical fuel consumption figures between 4.7 and 8.5 L/100 km across its petrol and diesel variants. Despite not having an electric version, its efficient diesels make a compelling case for economical, long-distance driving.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Design and Dimensions

In terms of design, both SUVs maintain their respective brand identities. The Ford Puma measures between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, with a width of 1805 mm, and stands about 1555 mm tall. These dimensions contribute to a sportier, compact feel without compromising interior space and comfort.

The VW T-Roc is slightly larger, with lengths varying from 4236 mm to 4271 mm and width around 1819 mm, while height ranges from 1527 mm to 1584 mm, providing a more robust and substantial presence on the road. Both cars offer seating for five, but the T-Roc's slightly larger dimensions grant it a slight edge in trunk capacity, which ranges from 392 to 445 liters compared to Puma’s 456 to 523 liters.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Technological Innovations

Both the Ford Puma and VW T-Roc are laden with technology, enhancing driver convenience and safety. The Puma incorporates Ford's Co-Pilot360, which offers an array of driver-assist technologies. Similarly, VW has packed the T-Roc with its latest tech, including a comprehensive suite of infotainment and connectivity options, ensuring both cars cater to modern tech enthusiasts.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Conclusion

In the clash between the Ford Puma and VW T-Roc, potential buyers have the pleasant dilemma of choosing between exceptional performance, efficiency, and technology. The Ford Puma stands out with its hybrid and electric offerings, appealing to eco-friendly users, while the VW T-Roc's robust engine lineup caters to those who prioritize power and versatility. Ultimately, the decision rests on individual brand loyalty and specific needs, both vehicles representing the pinnacle of compact SUV engineering.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 1667 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a a bit edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs barely noticeable better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 149 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs minimal better – up to 1350 L, which is about 67 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc barely noticeable takes the win – 515 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW T-Roc proves to be has a very small edge and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW T-Roc is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £26,400

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

Price : 26400 - 38000 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail : Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 115 - 150 HP
Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.3 L
Seats : 4 - 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 8.9 - 12.3 s
Model Year : 2024 - 2025
Max Speed : 187 - 212 km/h
Torque : 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3 - 4
Doors : 2 - 5
Model : T-Roc
Modell : T-Roc Cabriolet 1.0 TSI OPF, T-Roc Cabriolet 1.5 TSI OPF ACT, T-Roc 1.5 eTSI
CO2 Efficiency Class : E, D
Trim Level : Style, ENERGY, Style DSG, ENERGY DSG, R-Line, R-Line DSG, Trend DSG, Life DSG
Power kW : 85 - 110 kW
co2 : 126 - 143 g/km
Engine capacity : 999 - 1498 cm3
Curb weight : 1465 - 1539 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 50 L
Trunk capacity : 284 - 475 L
Length : 4271 - 4373 mm
Width : 1811 - 1828 mm
Height : 1527 - 1573 mm
Brand : VW
Max trunk capacity : 1350 L
Payload : 368 - 515 kg

details

Ford Puma

5 (1)

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

VW T-Roc

5 (2)

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW ID.3

If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG MG4

If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …

Ford Puma

VW T-Roc

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center	@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price 24800 - 36300 £	Price 26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 13.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 361 - 376 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 43 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 135 g/km	co2 126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 4 - 5
Doors 5	Doors 2 - 5
Curb weight 1316 - 1563 kg	Curb weight 1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L	Trunk capacity 284 - 475 L
Length 4186 - 4226 mm	Length 4271 - 4373 mm
Width 1805 mm	Width 1811 - 1828 mm
Height 1550 - 1555 mm	Height 1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity 1216 - 1283 L	Max trunk capacity 1350 L
Payload 367 - 469 kg	Payload 368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP	Power HP 115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed 160 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 187 - 212 km/h
Torque 170 - 290 Nm	Torque 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 92 - 124 kW	Power kW 85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 999 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3