VS

Mercedes EQT vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?

Mercedes EQT vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van: Key differences

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQT

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Mercedes EQT costs 27,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,334 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is only slightly more efficient: consuming 18.7 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 290 km, about 12 km more than the Mercedes EQT.

Kangoo Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 122 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.6 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is markedly faster – reaching 176 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van delivers marginally more torque with 270 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

EQT

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is visibly lighter – 1,493 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 432 kg.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers substantially more capacity – up to 4,900 L, about 2,921 L more than the Mercedes EQT.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries clearly more – 901 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 370 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Kangoo Compact Van is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,400
Kangoo Compact Van

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 75 - 122 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 270 - 290 km
Mercedes EQT
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
Mercedes EQT
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Price
22,400 - 37,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Curb weight
1,493 - 1,910 kg
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
4,486 - 4,910 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
1,854 - 1,864 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,900 L
Payload
457 - 531 kg
Payload
498 - 901 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
Torque
245 Nm
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.