Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (122 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (27800 £ vs 22400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £ , while the Mercedes EQT costs 27800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5334 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Renault Kangoo Compact Van: with 18.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Mercedes EQT with 19.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs slight better – achieving up to 290 km, about 12 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Kangoo Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
Both models deliver identical power – 122 HP each.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 11.60 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs evident better – reaching 176 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Kangoo Compact Van pulls minimal stronger with 270 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is evident lighter – 1493 kg compared to 1925 kg. The difference is around 432 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs significantly better – up to 4900 L, which is about 2921 L more than the Mercedes EQT.
When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo Compact Van convincingly takes the win – 901 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 370 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Kangoo Compact Van is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQT
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £22,400
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
details
Mercedes EQT
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.