Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Tesla Model Y - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (122 HP vs 627 HP), boot space and price (27800 £ vs 34300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Tesla Model Y?
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQT has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27800 £ , while the Tesla Model Y costs 34300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6503 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model Y: with 12.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s significantly more efficient than the Mercedes EQT with 19.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 6.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model Y performs decisively better – achieving up to 657 km, about 379 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Model Y
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model Y has a convincingly edge – offering 627 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 505 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model Y is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 9.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model Y performs convincingly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 118 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model Y pulls significantly stronger with 493 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 248 Nm difference.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mercedes EQT is minimal lighter – 1925 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 28 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model Y offers distinct more room – 822 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 271 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Tesla Model Y performs slight better – up to 2138 L, which is about 159 L more than the Mercedes EQT.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQT a bit takes the win – 531 kg compared to 472 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model Y is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQT
Tesla Model Y
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Tesla Model Y
Mercedes EQT
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Tesla Model Y
4.5 (4 Reviews)
The Tesla Model Y blends SUV practicality with sports-car poke, wrapping a roomy, minimalist cabin and handy hatch into a slick, aerodynamic package that feels more Silicon Valley gadget than garage ornament. It’s an ideal pick for buyers who want effortless electric driving, regular software improvements and access to Tesla’s convenient charging network, though style-conscious shoppers should know it’s more about tech and efficiency than classic luxury.
details
Mercedes EQT
Tesla Model Y
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
Price
34300 - 53100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.7 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 657 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 85 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
Curb weight
1953 - 2108 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
822 L
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
4790 - 4797 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1921 mm
|
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
Height
1611 - 1624 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2022 - 2138 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
440 - 472 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
299 - 627 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 493 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
220 - 461 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Tesla
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.