Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs smart #3 comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or smart #3?
Mercedes EQT vs smart #3: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes EQT is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,217 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the smart #3 is slightly more efficient: consuming 16.3 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 3.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the smart #3 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 177 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
#3
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 6.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers noticeably more torque with 384 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 139 Nm more.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is barely lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers noticeably more boot space – 551 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 181 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries slightly more – 531 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The smart #3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
£41,991
smart #3
Mercedes EQT
smart #3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
smart #3
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Mercedes EQT
smart #3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
smart
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.