Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Volvo S60?
Mercedes EQT vs Volvo S60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQT is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,740 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQT offers substantially more range – reaching up to 278 km, about 184 km more than the Volvo S60.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 333 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Volvo S60 is markedly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers substantially more torque with 709 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 464 Nm more.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is moderately lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 210 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers markedly more boot space – 551 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 124 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries slightly more – 531 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Mercedes EQT
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Mercedes EQT
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.