VS

Mercedes GLC EQ vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (489 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (61,100 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLC EQ or Mazda CX-60?

Mercedes GLC EQ vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GLC EQ

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 is visibly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,427 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers clearly more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 651 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers markedly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 162 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers visibly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

GLC EQ

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is clearly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 645 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 570 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries moderately more – 612 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC EQ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,100
GLC EQ

Mercedes GLC EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 645 - 714 km
Mercedes GLC EQ
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes GLC EQ

The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.

details

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
Mercedes GLC EQ
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,535 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,913 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
489 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
800 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
360 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.