Compare performance (472 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (50,300 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLC or Mitsubishi Outlander?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to choosing an SUV, both the Mercedes GLC and Mitsubishi Outlander present compelling offerings. However, each car caters to different priorities, with the GLC embracing luxury and performance and the Outlander focusing on efficiency and practicality. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that define these models.
The Mercedes GLC offers a variety of engine options, including Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, and Plugin Hybrid, ranging in power from 186 to an astounding 680 HP. The GLC's performance truly shines with an impressive acceleration range from 3.5 to 9 seconds in the 0-100 km/h sprint, depending on the variant. Maximum speeds top out at 275 km/h, showcasing the GLC's athletic capabilities.
On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Outlander stands out with its sole Plugin Hybrid powertrain, producing 306 HP and a 0-100 km/h time of 7.9 seconds. While its top speed of 170 km/h doesn't match the GLC's, it prioritizes efficiency with a low consumption rate of 0.8 L/100km, significantly aided by its electric range of up to 86 km.
Stepping inside, the GLC maintains Mercedes-Benz's hallmark of luxury, accommodating five passengers, with a trunk capacity ranging from 390 to 620 liters. Its interior leans towards a premium feel, providing advanced tech and high-quality materials.
The Outlander also seats five but takes the lead with practicality, offering 495 liters of trunk space and a subtly efficient interior equipped for everyday ease of use. The car's design emphasizes functionality without sacrificing comfort.
In terms of sustainability, the GLC offers a range of CO2 emissions from 10 to 235 g/km, with some variants displaying notable hybrid efficiency. It exemplifies the blend of performance with moderate environmental consciousness.
The Outlander sets a high standard for eco-friendliness with a CO2 emission of just 18 g/km, reflecting its optimization for reduced environmental impact. Its “B” efficiency class underscores Mitsubishi's commitment to future-forward sustainability.
Dimensionally, the GLC and Outlander are closely matched, with the GLC's lengths spanning from 4716 to 4792 mm, widths of 1890 mm, and height sitting between 1603 mm and 1647 mm. Its design is sleek yet robust, displaying the elegance synonymous with Mercedes-Benz.
The Outlander measures slightly longer at 4719 mm, with a width of 1862 mm and increased height ranging from 1746 to 1750 mm, enhancing its commanding road presence and offering additional headroom.
The Mercedes GLC and Mitsubishi Outlander each represent excellent SUV options, catering to different needs. The GLC is for those seeking luxury and performance, while the Outlander appeals to environmentally conscious drivers valuing efficiency and practicality. Your choice ultimately hinges on whether you prioritize the thrill of performance or the virtue of efficiency and space.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi Outlander is slightly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mercedes GLC costs 50,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,479 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLC uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mitsubishi Outlander with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 128 km, about 43 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC offers noticeably more power – delivering 472 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 166 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes GLC is only slightly lighter – 1,985 kg compared to 2,156 kg. The difference is around 171 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers somewhat more boot space – 620 L compared to 498 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLC carries barely more – 575 kg compared to 529 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
The Mercedes GLC is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes GLC blends quiet refinement with premium materials to create a comfortable, modern cabin that feels more upscale than its size might suggest. It delivers composed handling and confident on-road manners while offering practical versatility and a strong suite of driver assistance and infotainment features.
details
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,300 - 82,100 £
|
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
122 - 128 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
41 - 214 g/km
|
co2
60 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,985 - 2,400 kg
|
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
|
Trunk capacity
498 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 - 1,920 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
475 - 575 kg
|
Payload
453 - 529 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
186 - 472 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
380 - 750 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
137 - 347 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,993 - 2,999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España