VS

Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (28,800 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • significantly more power
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vito Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mercedes Vito Transporter is significantly cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 246,618 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Vito Transporter uses 6.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 9.2 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers significantly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 363 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers significantly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is noticeably lighter – 1,916 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 744 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries marginally more – 884 kg compared to 840 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Transporter stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,800
Vito Transporter

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 304 - 474 km
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Vito Transporter

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 222 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
547 - 884 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.