VS

MG Cyberster vs MINI Countryman comparison

Compare performance (510 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (55,700 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Cyberster or MINI Countryman?

MG Cyberster vs MINI Countryman: Key differences

MG Cyberster

  • visibly more power
  • barely more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • noticeably lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Cyberster

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MINI Countryman is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,100 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,620 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Countryman is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the MG Cyberster. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers barely more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 10 km more than the MINI Countryman.

Countryman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers visibly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 313 HP. That’s roughly 197 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the MINI Countryman takes 5.6 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers markedly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 494 Nm. That’s about 231 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: MINI Countryman offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Countryman is noticeably lighter – 1,570 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 390 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MINI Countryman offers substantially more boot space – 505 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 305 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Countryman carries considerably more – 500 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 350 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Countryman is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,100
Countryman

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.9 - 6.5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 463 - 497 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
MINI Countryman
VS
Kia's fresh EV3 goes head-to-head with the MINI Countryman in a fight that contrasts pragmatic electric range and modern tech with charismatic style and all‑round versatility. We compare space, equipment, driving feel and ownership costs to find which one earns its place in your garage.
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
MG Cyberster
MINI Countryman

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr

Reviews MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Urszula
13 Apr 2026, 06:42:12

Beautiful design, carefully finished inside, large display, very comfortable ride with the automatic gearbox, a bit cramped in the back, fairly spacious boot.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MINI Countryman
VW ID.3
VS
The MINI Countryman and the VW ID.3 take very different approaches to practical compact motoring: the Countryman blends a premium, characterful small‑SUV package with petrol and hybrid options, while the ID.3 focuses on pure-electric efficiency, interior space and low running costs. If you value …
MINI Countryman
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the MINI Countryman and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value the Countryman's premium, sporty feel or the Elroq's roomy practicality and value. This comparison highlights the real-world differences in driving character, interior space, equipment and running costs to help …
BMW iX1
MINI Countryman
VS
Deciding between the BMW iX1 and the MINI Countryman? This comparison cuts through the marketing to focus on what matters—interior space, driving dynamics, efficiency and running costs—so you can choose whether the iX1’s electric sophistication or the Countryman’s flexible character fits your life …
Ford Explorer EV
MINI Countryman
VS
The all-new Ford Explorer EV emerges as a formidable contender in the electric SUV market, offering impressive range and spacious interiors, ideal for family adventures. On the other hand, the MINI Countryman, now with an electrified twist, charms with its iconic design and agile handling, making …
Mazda CX-30
MINI Countryman
VS
Mazda CX-30 and MINI Countryman go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the …
Mercedes GLA
MINI Countryman
VS
Mercedes GLA and MINI Countryman go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes GLA or the …
MINI Countryman
VW T-Roc
VS
In the bustling compact crossover segment, the MINI Countryman and VW T-Roc both sharpen their competitive edges with distinctive flair and functional versatility. The Countryman charms with its iconic British styling and go-kart-like handling, making every drive a spirited affair. Meanwhile, the …
MINI Countryman
Opel Frontera
VS
MINI Countryman and Opel Frontera go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MINI Countryman or …
MG Cyberster
MINI Countryman

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Price
30,100 - 39,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.9 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Roadster
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
200 L
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,913 mm
Width
1,843 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
150 kg
Payload
475 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 10.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, E
Brand
MG
Brand
MINI
What drivetrain options does the MG Cyberster have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.