VS

MG Cyberster vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (510 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (55,700 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Cyberster or Suzuki Swace?

MG Cyberster vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

MG Cyberster

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Cyberster

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Swace is clearly cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,828 £.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers clearly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 370 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 6.2 s quicker.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Suzuki Swace offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is clearly lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 485 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers substantially more boot space – 596 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 396 L.

When it comes to payload, the Suzuki Swace carries substantially more – 360 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 210 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 443 - 507 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports, both cars deliver remarkable hybrid performance with a focus on fuel efficiency and practicality. The Suzuki Swace, essentially a rebadged version of the Corolla, offers nearly identical interiors and …
MG Cyberster
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG Cyberster
Honda Prelude
VS
MG Cyberster and Honda Prelude go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MG Cyberster or the …
Mercedes G-Class
Suzuki Swace
VS
Mercedes G-Class and Suzuki Swace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes G-Class or …
Opel Astra
Suzuki Swace
VS
Opel Astra and Suzuki Swace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Opel Astra or the Suzuki …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Swace
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Suzuki S-Cross and Suzuki Swace offer distinct choices for drivers seeking style and functionality. The S-Cross impresses with its rugged design and versatile all-wheel-drive capabilities, making it ideal for adventurous lifestyles, while the Swace, with …
MG Cyberster
Ferrari Luce
VS
MG Cyberster and Ferrari Luce go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MG Cyberster or the …
Kia Niro
Suzuki Swace
VS
Kia Niro and Suzuki Swace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Niro or the Suzuki Swace …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Suzuki Swace
VS
In the compact car segment, the Mazda 3 Sedan and the Suzuki Swace offer distinctive choices for discerning drivers. The Mazda 3 Sedan is celebrated for its stylish design and engaging driving dynamics, boasting a premium interior and advanced technology. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace, with its …
Suzuki Swace
Volvo S90
VS
Suzuki Swace and Volvo S90 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Suzuki Swace or the Volvo …
MG Cyberster
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Roadster
Body Type
Estate
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
200 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
150 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
MG
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the MG Cyberster have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.