Compare performance (17 HP vs 233 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 64,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Micro Microlino or Ford Nugget?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Micro Microlino is considerably cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Ford Nugget costs 64,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 49,299 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Nugget offers clearly more power – delivering 233 HP compared to 17 HP. That’s roughly 216 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Nugget delivers substantially more torque with 390 Nm compared to 89 Nm. That’s about 301 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Nugget offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
Looking at boot space, the Micro Microlino offers significantly more boot space – 230 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 230 L.
The Micro Microlino holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Micro Microlino is a delightful retro-styled city runabout that feels like a modern reinterpretation of a classic bubble car, perfect for threading through tight streets and turning heads at every junction. It’s unabashedly charming and ideal for urban life, but buyers should embrace the playful simplicity over family-hauler practicality.
details
The Ford Nugget is a versatile camper van designed for adventurers who crave both comfort and practicality on the road. With its clever use of space, the Nugget provides ample room for sleeping, cooking, and relaxing, making it a popular choice for those looking to experience the joys of a mobile lifestyle. Its design integrates seamlessly with modern technology, ensuring both convenience and a smooth driving experience.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,400 - 22,300 £
|
Price
64,700 - 78,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
8.9 - 9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
93 - 228 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
234 - 235 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback, Convertible
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
596 - 630 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
230 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,450 mm
|
|
Width
1,473 mm
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
120 - 154 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
8 - 17 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 233 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
89 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
6 - 12 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 171 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Micro
|
Brand
Ford
|