Is the Mitsubishi Colt offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mitsubishi Colt?

Depending on the version, the Mitsubishi Colt delivers up to 143 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mitsubishi Colt according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.20 L.

What maximum speed does the Mitsubishi Colt reach?

The Mitsubishi Colt reaches up to 174 km/h.

What are the Mitsubishi Colt’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Mitsubishi Colt is 4053 mm long, 1798 mm wide and 1439 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the VW Polo have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo reaches a peak output of 207 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the VW Polo use?

On average, the VW Polo consumes 5.10 L.

What are the dimensions of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo measures 4074 mm long, 1751 mm wide and 1451 mm high.

Mitsubishi Colt vs VW Polo – Which car is better? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Polo @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW Polo has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the Mitsubishi Colt costs 18200 £. That’s a price difference of around 1161 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Colt manages with 4.20 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

Polo @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo has a evident edge – offering 207 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.30 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs distinct better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 66 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW Polo pulls clearly stronger with 320 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.

Polo @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Polo is barely noticeable lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1189 kg. The difference is around 46 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers slightly more room – 391 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Polo performs barely noticeable better – up to 1125 L, which is about 56 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.

When it comes to payload, VW Polo slightly takes the win – 457 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW Polo shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

Reviews VW Polo

Top Car Comparisons

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Yaris

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Polo

VS

In the compact car showdown, the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo both make compelling cases, each boasting its own unique strengths. The Yaris shines with its impressive fuel efficiency and dependable reliability, making it a practical choice for everyday driving. On the other hand, the Polo …

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Polo

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Cross

VS

In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Polo and the VW T-Cross cater to different driving needs while maintaining Volkswagen's signature quality. The Polo, a beloved supermini, offers a sleek and nimble ride ideal for urban environments, boasting efficiency and precision handling. On the other hand, …

Costs and Consumption
Price 18200 - 25000 £	Price 17000 - 30400 £
Consumption L/100km 4.2 - 5.3 L	Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 96 - 119 g/km	co2 116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 39 - 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Hatchback	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1189 - 1380 kg	Curb weight 1143 - 1378 kg
Trunk capacity 301 - 391 L	Trunk capacity 351 L
Length 4053 mm	Length 4074 mm
Width 1798 mm	Width 1751 mm
Height 1439 mm	Height 1431 - 1451 mm
Max trunk capacity 979 - 1069 L	Max trunk capacity 1125 L
Payload 381 - 385 kg	Payload 432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 91 - 143 HP	Power HP 80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.3 - 12.2 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed 174 km/h	Max Speed 171 - 240 km/h
Torque 148 - 160 Nm	Torque 93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 67 - 105 kW	Power kW 59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3