VS

Toyota Aygo vs VW Polo comparison

Compare performance (116 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (18,800 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Aygo or VW Polo?

Toyota Aygo vs VW Polo: Key differences

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter

VW Polo

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Aygo

A Comprehensive Comparison: Toyota Aygo vs. VW Polo

In today's automotive market, compact city cars are growing in popularity due to their efficiency and versatility. Among the leading contenders in this segment are the Toyota Aygo and the VW Polo. Both vehicles offer unique features and specifications appealing to various consumers. This comparison examines their technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance to help you make an informed decision.

Polo

Body Structure and Dimensions

The Toyota Aygo is classified as an SUV, with dimensions measuring 3700 mm in length, 1740 mm in width, and 1510 mm in height, providing a compact yet spacious interior for passengers. With a curb weight of 1015 kg, the Aygo is lightweight, which contributes to its agile handling.

In contrast, the VW Polo is a hatchback with a larger footprint, boasting dimensions of 4074 mm in length, 1751 mm in width, and 1451-1431 mm in height, depending on the variant. This larger size allows the Polo to accommodate up to five passengers comfortably and offers a substantial trunk capacity of 351 liters. The Polo's curb weight ranges from 1138 kg to 1372 kg, depending on the engine option chosen.

Aygo

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Under the hood, the Toyota Aygo is equipped with a 998 cm³ petrol engine, producing 72 HP and 93 Nm of torque. This engine configuration allows for a maximum speed of 158 km/h and an acceleration time from 0 to 100 km/h of 15.5-15.6 seconds. The Aygo impresses with its fuel efficiency, managing a consumption of 4.8 to 4.9 L/100 km and CO2 emissions of 108-112 g/km, which places it within the C efficiency class.

The VW Polo offers a broader range of engine options, including a 999 cm³ engine producing 80 to 115 HP and a larger 1984 cm³ engine delivering up to an impressive 207 HP. The Polo's torque varies, reaching up to 320 Nm with the 2.0-liter engine. The Polo's acceleration times are significantly faster, particularly with the high-performance variants that achieve 0-100 km/h in as little as 6.5 seconds. Fuel consumption for the Polo ranges from 5.2 to 6.5 L/100 km with CO2 emissions varying between 118 to 149 g/km, categorizing it in efficiency classes D and E.

Polo

Transmission Options

The Toyota Aygo offers both manual and automatic transmission options, including a traditional manual gearbox and a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), giving drivers flexibility in how they want to engage with their driving experience.

The VW Polo stands out due to its Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT), available alongside a manual gearbox. This innovative transmission type allows for quick gear shifts and greater efficiency, enhancing the overall driving dynamics of the Polo.

Aygo

Interior Comfort and Technology

Interior features play a significant role in modern vehicles, and both the Aygo and Polo offer user-friendly designs. The Aygo boasts comfortable seating for up to four and an intuitive dashboard layout, though it's a bit simpler in terms of tech features compared to its rival. Standard entertainment features include a modern audio system with Bluetooth connectivity.

On the other hand, the VW Polo is renowned for its more upscale interior design, accommodating five passengers and offering advanced technology like an infotainment system with a larger touchscreen, smartphone integration, and optional premium sound systems. The Polo's additional space and premium materials contribute to a more luxurious feel.

Polo

Safety and Innovations

Safety is paramount in both models. The Aygo incorporates essential safety features including airbags, anti-lock brakes, and stability control. More advanced driver assistance systems may be less prevalent, but Toyota’s reputation for reliability and safety is well-founded.

The VW Polo, however, pushes innovation further with an extensive array of safety options, including adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and emergency braking systems. The Polo's construction and technology help it achieve high safety ratings in crash tests, making it a standout in this category.

Aygo

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

When deciding between the Toyota Aygo and VW Polo, it ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities. The Aygo offers excellent fuel efficiency and ease of maneuverability in urban settings, making it a great option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the VW Polo provides superior performance, a more spacious interior, and advanced technology, appealing to those who seek comfort and innovation in a compact car.

Both cars have their strengths, and the final choice will depend on your specific needs and lifestyle. Whether you lean towards the practicality of the Aygo or the premium feel of the Polo, you are sure to find satisfaction in either model.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aygo

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Polo is marginally cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,590 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Polo

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo offers considerably more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 91 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 9.2 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Polo delivers significantly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

Aygo

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: VW Polo offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Aygo is only slightly lighter – 1,090 kg compared to 1,143 kg. The difference is around 53 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Polo offers markedly more boot space – 351 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Polo carries very slightly more – 457 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Polo stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Polo

VW Polo

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details
Toyota Aygo
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Toyota Aygo

The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.

details
75916-2022aygoxdplstaticginger003-web-lr
75919-2022aygoxdplstaticginger006-web-lr
75917-2022aygoxdplstaticginger004-web-lr
75918-2022aygoxdplstaticginger005-web-lr
75881-2022aygoxdpldetailginger007-web-lr
75806-2022aygoxdpldetailchilired003-web-lr

Reviews Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
giuseppe
3 Dec 2025, 14:18:34

Great, not least because it makes excellent use of the automatic gearbox; I also found it better assembled and more refined.

VW Polo

The Polo is a small car with surprisingly grown-up refinement, delivering comfortable packaging, crisp handling and a build quality that punches above its class. For buyers who want a practical, fuss-free hatch that still feels a little premium, it’s a sensible, slightly cheeky choice you’ll enjoy every day.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
Suzuki Ignis
Toyota Aygo
VS
The Suzuki Ignis feels like a pint‑sized crossover — taller ride, roomier boot and a dash of go‑anywhere attitude — while the Toyota Aygo is a cheeky city sprite: compact, cheap to run and brilliant at threading through town. Pick the Ignis if you want practicality and a bit of off‑road bravado in …
Toyota Aygo
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Aygo is a cheeky, pocket-sized city flirt — nimble, affordable and full of personality, but cramped and a little outgunned on fast roads. The Yaris is the grown-up supermini: roomier, safer and available as a frugal hybrid, making it the smarter choice for buyers who want everyday practicality …
Kia Picanto
Toyota Aygo
VS
Kia Picanto is the sensible choice — roomier, better equipped and more grown-up to drive, so it suits buyers who want a proper small car without compromises. The Toyota Aygo is the cheeky, city-savvy toy: cheaper to run and full of character, but falls short on space and refinement compared with …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive supermini segment, the Renault Clio and VW Polo stand out for their blend of style, performance, and practicality. The Clio boasts a more dynamic design and an engaging driving experience, while the Polo is celebrated for its refined build quality and advanced technology …
Toyota Aygo
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Toyota Aygo and Toyota Yaris Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive segment of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize excitement behind the wheel. On the other hand, the VW Polo offers a more traditional hatchback experience, characterized by its solid …
Toyota Yaris
VW Polo
VS
In the compact car showdown, the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo both make compelling cases, each boasting its own unique strengths. The Yaris shines with its impressive fuel efficiency and dependable reliability, making it a practical choice for everyday driving. On the other hand, the Polo …
Toyota Aygo
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 g/km
co2
116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,090 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Trunk capacity
231 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,740 mm
Width
1,751 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 kg
Payload
432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 HP
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
120 Nm
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 kW
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Toyota
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Toyota Aygo?

The Toyota Aygo is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.