Compare performance (82 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 18,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swift or Toyota Aygo?
Suzuki Swift arrives with the kind of sporty swagger that hints at a livelier character, while the Toyota Aygo prefers a cheeky, fashionable look that turns heads in tight urban streets. Both have distinct identities: one feels poised and grown-up, the other playful and smile-inducing. Pick your vibe and the choice becomes as much about attitude as it is about practicality.
The Aygo makes city life effortless with a compact footprint and an instinct for squeezing into awkward parking slots, making it an ideal companion for daily commutes and short trips. The Swift is no slouch in town either, but its more planted presence gives added confidence when you leave the stop-and-go and head onto faster roads. If your daily routine mixes tight streets with open stretches, think about which balance of nimbleness and composure you prefer.
Step inside and you feel the difference in intent: the Swift’s cabin leans toward practicality and a touch of refinement, offering a more grown-up environment for longer stints behind the wheel. The Aygo injects personality with bright accents and a compact, cheerful layout that suits short hops and city errands, though it asks a bit more compromise from rear passengers. For families or those who regularly carry gear, the way space is used may be the deciding factor.
On a winding backroad the Swift rewards with a livelier, more assured demeanor that invites a spirited drive without fussing the occupants. The Aygo delights with a light-footed, agile character that’s honest and entertaining where big-speed bravado isn’t required, but it won’t pretend to be a long-distance grand tourer. In short, one leans toward engagement and composure, the other toward city-minded fun and pragmatism.
Both offer sensible running profiles for drivers who prioritise low hassle and straightforward maintenance, yet they appeal to different ownership philosophies: one aims to be an economical, easy-to-live-with companion, the other to be a cost-conscious gateway into stylish, useful motoring. Equipment levels and options packages will influence perceived value more than headline figures, so look closely at real-world features rather than just the sticker. Either way, buyers get a dependable, no-nonsense small car that’s cheap to love and relatively cheap to keep.
If your life revolves around tight city streets, short commutes and a desire to stand out with a quirky, fashionable ride, the Aygo is tuned to that role and does it with charm. If you need something that can double as a comfortable daily driver for longer trips while still being small enough for town, the Swift’s broader usefulness will appeal to small families and commuters who demand a bit more composure. Match the car’s character to your typical day and you’ll rarely be disappointed.
We’ve laid out the personalities, the daily realities and the driver profiles — now it’s time to see which model earns the DriveDuel Champion crown. Read on for our final verdict and a side-by-side summary that will make choosing your next small car a lot easier. Your perfect city companion might be just a scroll away.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Swift is only slightly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,706 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Suzuki Swift with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo offers markedly more power – delivering 116 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Aygo delivers very slightly more torque with 120 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 8 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Suzuki Swift offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is only slightly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,090 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swift offers moderately more boot space – 265 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 34 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Aygo carries noticeably more – 420 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.
The Toyota Aygo is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
details
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
co2
85 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
Curb weight
1,090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
3,860 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
Width
1,740 mm
|
|
Height
1,485 - 1,510 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
980 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Payload
420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
Torque
120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España