Citroen C3 vs Toyota Aygo comparison

Q: How powerful is the Citroen C3's engine?

Up to 113 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Citroen C3 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Citroen C3 use per 100 km?

Average electricity consumption is 16.60 kWh.

Q: What is the electric driving range of the Citroen C3?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 325 km.

Q: What maximum speed does the Citroen C3 reach?

The Citroen C3 reaches up to 132 km/h.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Citroen C3?

The Citroen C3 measures 4015 mm long, 1755 mm wide and 1567 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Toyota Aygo?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the Toyota Aygo deliver on the road?

Up to 116 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What are the consumption figures for the Toyota Aygo in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 3.70 L.

Compare performance (113 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (13700 £ vs 18800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Toyota Aygo?

scroll down

The Ultimate Showdown: Citroen C3 vs Toyota Aygo

The automotive market is teeming with compact cars designed for urban commuting, but two stand out among the crowd: the Citroen C3 and the Toyota Aygo. With different approaches to design, performance, and technology, both vehicles appeal to a diverse demographic. In this comparison, we'll delve into their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall driving experience to help you decide which compact car is the better fit for your lifestyle.

Aygo

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to dimensions, the Citroen C3 measures in at 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height. It boasts a spacious trunk capacity of 310 liters, catering well to daily needs. In contrast, the Toyota Aygo takes a more compact approach, with length, width, and height measured at 3700 mm, 1740 mm, and 1510 mm, respectively. The Aygo’s trunk offers a smaller capacity of 231 liters, making it more suitable for city dwellers who prioritize maneuverability over storage space.

Engine Performance and Efficiency

The Citroen C3 presents a variety of engine options, including petrol, electric, and petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle), with power outputs ranging from 101 to 113 HP. Its fuel consumption sits between 5.5 to 5.6 L/100 km, depending on the variant, while the electric model boasts a range of 320 to 326 km, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious drivers. The C3’s acceleration is impressive, capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 9.9 seconds with higher variants.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo is equipped with a petrol engine that produces 72 HP, paired with a consumption of 4.8 to 4.9 L/100 km. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h lags behind the C3, taking around 15.5 to 15.6 seconds, which may deter those seeking a more spirited drive. However, the Aygo’s lightweight design, with a curb weight of just 1015 kg, enhances its agility in city driving conditions.

Aygo

Transmission and Drive Type

Both models offer a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. The Citroen C3 features a robust dual-clutch automatic option, improving driving comfort and efficiency. In contrast, the Aygo comes with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), providing smooth acceleration and responsiveness in urban traffic.

Both cars utilize a front-wheel drive configuration, but the power delivery in the Citroen C3, with its more powerful engines, tends to deliver a snappier driving experience compared to the lighter but less powerful Toyota Aygo.

scroll down

Technology and Features

Citroen has equipped the C3 with modern technology and driver assistance features, catering to drivers who appreciate connectivity and safety. With its advanced infotainment system, touchscreen interface, and smartphone integration capabilities, the C3 stands out as a tech-savvy option for younger consumers. Its climate control, navigation, and safety features are designed to enhance overall comfort and driving confidence.

Meanwhile, the Toyota Aygo retains a more stripped-down tech approach but includes essential features aimed at providing a reliable driving experience. Its infotainment system is straightforward and easy to use, fitting well with the Aygo's youthful and practical branding. Although it lacks some of the advanced tech of the C3, it excels in delivering no-fuss utility.

Aygo

Safety and Environmental Impact

Safety ratings for both vehicles are commendable, with the Citroen C3 offering a variety of standard safety features such as lane assist and emergency braking. The CO2 emissions for the C3 hover at around 126 g/km, making it a fairly eco-friendly choice compared to its competitors.

The Toyota Aygo, with its CO2 efficiency class rated at C, emits roughly 108 to 112 g/km of CO2, showcasing its own eco-credentials in the compact segment. While not as complex as the C3, it serves as a solid option for urban environments where low emissions are sought after.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Citroen C3 and Toyota Aygo each present their own strengths and weaknesses. The C3 is better suited for those who seek a blend of performance, space, and modern technology, making it ideal for a family or those who require more versatility in their vehicle.

Conversely, the Aygo shines in urban agility and efficiency, perfect for city dwellers who value simplicity and straightforward functionality. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your specific needs—whether that leans more towards space and tech or agility and everyday practicality.

Citroen C3 vs Toyota Aygo: Key differences

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)

evident cheaper
distinct more trunk space

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)

hardly perceptible more power
distinct more efficient
barely noticeable quicker from 0–100 km/h
somewhat lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aygo

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen C3 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 13700 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 3.70 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 116 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 9.20 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.90 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Citroen C3 pulls clearly stronger with 205 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Citroen C3 offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is somewhat lighter – 1090 kg compared to 1226 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Citroen C3 offers distinct more room – 310 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.

When it comes to payload, Citroen C3 hardly perceptible takes the win – 423 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift

Toyota Aygo

If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …

Kia Picanto

Toyota Aygo

Kia Picanto is the sensible choice — roomier, better equipped and more grown-up to drive, so it suits buyers who want a proper small car without compromises. The Toyota Aygo is the cheeky, city-savvy toy: cheaper to run and full of character, but falls short on space and refinement compared with …

Citroen C3

Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption L/100km

co2

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Torque

Number of Cylinders

Power kW

Engine capacity

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Payload

from about £13,700

Citroen C3

Price : 13700 - 24600 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 101 - 113 HP
Consumption L/100km : 5 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 - 17.2 kWh
Electric Range : 206 - 325 km
Seats : 2 - 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 9.9 - 12 s
Model Year : 2024 - 2026
Max Speed : 125 - 132 km/h
Torque : 120 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3
Doors : 5
Model : C3
Modell : e-C3 Standard Range, e-C3 Urban Range, C3 Turbo 100, C3 Hybrid 110, Turbo 100, Hybrid 110
CO2 Efficiency Class : A, D, C
Trim Level : Max, You, Plus, Van, Plus e-DCS, Max e-DCS, Team D, Team D e-DCS
Power kW : 74 - 83 kW
co2 : 0 - 126 g/km
Engine capacity : 1199 cm3
Curb weight : 1226 - 1518 kg
Trunk capacity : 310 L
Length : 4015 mm
Width : 1755 mm
Height : 1567 mm
Brand : Citroen
Max trunk capacity : 1220 L
Payload : 227 - 423 kg

details

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)

The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.

details

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)

The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.

details

75916-2022aygoxdplstaticginger003-web-lr

75919-2022aygoxdplstaticginger006-web-lr

75917-2022aygoxdplstaticginger004-web-lr

75918-2022aygoxdplstaticginger005-web-lr

75881-2022aygoxdpldetailginger007-web-lr

75806-2022aygoxdpldetailchilired003-web-lr

Citroen C3

Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption
Price 13700 - 24600 £	Price 18800 - 24300 £
Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km 3.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.2 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 206 - 325 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 126 g/km	co2 85 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 2 - 5	Seats 4
Doors 5	Doors -
Curb weight 1226 - 1518 kg	Curb weight 1090 kg
Trunk capacity 310 L	Trunk capacity 231 L
Length 4015 mm	Length -
Width 1755 mm	Width 1740 mm
Height 1567 mm	Height -
Max trunk capacity 1220 L	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 227 - 423 kg	Payload 420 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 101 - 113 HP	Power HP 116 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.9 - 12 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.20 s
Max Speed 125 - 132 km/h	Max Speed -
Torque 120 - 205 Nm	Torque 120 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 74 - 83 kW	Power kW 85 kW
Engine capacity 1199 cm3	Engine capacity 1490 cm3