VS

Kia Picanto vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (68 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (15,300 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Picanto or Suzuki Swift?

Kia Picanto vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

Kia Picanto

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper

Suzuki Swift

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Picanto

The automotive landscape is ever-evolving, and among the compact hatchback segment, the Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift stand out as two popular contenders. Each offers its own set of innovations, performance metrics, and features, appealing to different segments of drivers. This article explores the key technical aspects, innovations, and overall user experience of these two vehicles, providing a comprehensive comparison for potential buyers.

Swift

Performance and Engine Specifications

The Kia Picanto is available with two petrol engine options. The 1.0L three-cylinder engine produces 63 HP, while the more powerful 1.2L four-cylinder option delivers 79 HP. The Picanto's performance is complemented by choices of a manual or automated manual transmission, helping it achieve a quick 0-100 km/h acceleration in as little as 13.1 seconds. Additionally, the Picanto boasts a top speed of 145 km/h with a torque range of 95 Nm to 115 Nm.

In comparison, the Suzuki Swift features a single 1.2L three-cylinder petrol engine generating 82 HP, paired with either a manual gearbox or a CVT. The Swift is slightly quicker with a 0-100 km/h time of 10.9 seconds. The Swift’s top speed reaches 170 km/h and provides a torque output of 112 Nm, making it slightly more powerful in terms of acceleration compared to its Kia rival.

Picanto

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for buyers in this segment. The Kia Picanto sacrifices a tad more in this department with a consumption rate ranging between 5.2 to 5.7 L/100km. This is slightly less appealing when juxtaposed against the Suzuki Swift’s figures, which provide an efficient consumption rate of 4.4 to 4.9 L/100km. Thus, in terms of fuel economy, the Swift gains an advantage, underscoring its suitability for cost-conscious drivers.

Swift

Interior and Comfort

Inside the cabin, both vehicles offer practical yet contemporary designs. The Kia Picanto can comfortably seat four to five passengers and features a trunk capacity of 255 L, which is slightly smaller than the Suzuki Swift’s 265 L. The Picanto measures 3605 mm in length and 1595 mm in width, whereas the Swift stretches out to 3860 mm in length and 1735 mm in width, offering slightly more room for both passengers and cargo.

The interior of the Swift also reflects a modern approach with a focus on ergonomics and driver comfort, providing ample space for five passengers. Moreover, the Suzuki Swift is renowned for its user-friendly infotainment system, which includes a touchscreen interface, Bluetooth connectivity, and smartphone integration, putting it ahead in technology integration.

Picanto

Safety and Technology Innovations

When it comes to safety, both manufacturers have incorporated innovative features. The Kia Picanto benefits from a standard suite of airbags, Electronic Stability Control (ESC), and advanced braking technology, ensuring a safe drive. Additionally, the Picanto’s CO2 emissions rate ranges from 118 to 130 g/km, achieving a CO2 efficiency class of D.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift boasts an impressive safety rating with its advanced safety features. The Swift’s CO2 emissions are more efficient, ranging from 98 to 110 g/km, placing it in the CO2 efficiency class C. Features like adaptive cruise control, autonomous emergency braking, and lane departure warning are available, providing peace of mind for modern-day drivers.

Swift

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift present strong arguments for consideration in the hatchback category. The Picanto stands out with its charming design, sufficient performance, and compact sizing suitable for urban environments; however, it falls short in fuel efficiency compared to the Swift. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swift excels in power, fuel economy, safety features, and overall interior space. Ultimately, the choice will depend on individual priorities—whether it's spirited performance and safety or compact maneuverability and efficient driving. Both cars are commendable options in their own right, catering to diverse preferences in today’s automotive market.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Yaris
VS
Ring the bell for a city‑car showdown: the feisty Suzuki Swift takes on the ever‑practical Toyota Yaris. The Swift flirts with sporty handling and cheeky styling, while the Yaris trades pizzazz for polished build, frugal engines (including a sensible hybrid) and the kind of reliability that keeps …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Picanto

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia Picanto is somewhat cheaper – starting at 15,300 £ , while the Suzuki Swift costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,842 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Kia Picanto with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Swift offers slightly more power – delivering 82 HP compared to 68 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Swift delivers somewhat more torque with 112 Nm compared to 96 Nm. That’s about 16 Nm more.

Picanto

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is very slightly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,124 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Kia Picanto carries moderately more – 332 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 36 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Swift is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Swift

Suzuki Swift

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 82 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
details
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Picanto

Kia Picanto is a cheeky city hatch that squeezes surprising style, practicality and a smile-inducing drive into a pocket-friendly package. It’s ideal for urban buyers who want fuss-free running, effortless parking and a car that punches above its class without pretending to be anything it’s not.

details
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_01
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_03
Kia Picanto X-Line_02
Kia_Picanto_MJ22_Innen_01

Reviews Kia Picanto

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Suzuki Ignis is the cheeky mini‑crossover — tall, practical and rugged enough to shrug off potholes and a weekend’s worth of kit — while the Suzuki Swift is the sprightly hatch that rewards sharper steering, brisk responses and a more engaging drive. Choose the Ignis for visibility, space and …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Honda Jazz and Suzuki Swift stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Jazz boasts a versatile interior with its innovative Magic Seats, allowing for exceptional cargo flexibility, while the Swift captivates with its sporty design and …
Kia Picanto
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Kia Picanto is a cheeky city sparrow: tiny, cheap to buy and park, and surprisingly fun to hustle through tight streets if you don’t need boot space or long‑distance refinement. The Toyota Yaris, meanwhile, feels grown‑up by comparison — roomier, safer and available as an economical hybrid, so …
Citroen C3
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive world of compact cars, the Citroën C3 and Suzuki Swift both offer distinct advantages catering to different driving preferences. The Citroën C3 impresses with its unique, stylish design and comfortable ride, making it a great choice for urban environments. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Kia Picanto
Toyota Aygo
VS
Kia Picanto is the sensible choice — roomier, better equipped and more grown-up to drive, so it suits buyers who want a proper small car without compromises. The Toyota Aygo is the cheeky, city-savvy toy: cheaper to run and full of character, but falls short on space and refinement compared with …
Hyundai i10
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …
Hyundai i20
Kia Picanto
VS
In the highly competitive subcompact segment, the Hyundai i20 and Kia Picanto both offer a blend of style, efficiency, and advanced technology. While the i20 impresses with its spacious interior and robust performance, the Picanto stands out with its nimble handling and vibrant aesthetics. …
Kia Picanto
Kia Stonic
VS
When comparing the Kia Picanto and the Kia Stonic, both models showcase the brand's commitment to stylish design and impressive efficiency. The Picanto stands out with its compact size, making it perfect for urban driving, while the Stonic offers a more rugged look and additional cargo space, …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,300 - 19,300 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 134 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
37 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,124 - 1,131 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
265 L
Length
-
Length
3,860 mm
Width
1,595 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
-
Height
1,485 - 1,510 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
980 L
Payload
253 - 332 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
68 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.6 - 17.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Torque
96 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
50 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Kia Picanto have?

The Kia Picanto is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.