Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
NIO ET5 vs Polestar 2 comparison
Compare performance (490 HP vs 476 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – NIO ET5 or Polestar 2?
NIO ET5 vs Polestar 2: Key differences
ET5
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
NIO ET5 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Polestar 2 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,277 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Polestar 2 is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.6 kWh/100km for the NIO ET5. That’s a difference of about 3.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Polestar 2 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 659 km, about 69 km more than the NIO ET5.
2
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 offers very slightly more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 476 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET5 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Polestar 2 takes 4.2 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Polestar 2 is only slightly faster – reaching 205 km/h, while the NIO ET5 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 2 delivers barely more torque with 740 Nm compared to 700 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
ET5
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Polestar 2 is very slightly lighter – 2,015 kg compared to 2,215 kg. The difference is around 200 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Polestar 2 offers marginally more boot space – 405 L compared to 386 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.
For maximum load capacity, the NIO ET5 offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,135 L, about 40 L more than the Polestar 2.
When it comes to payload, the NIO ET5 carries somewhat more – 475 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Polestar 2 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,000
Polestar 2
NIO ET5
Polestar 2
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
NIO ET5
NIO ET5 arrives with sleek, minimalist lines and a cabin that feels more like a calm lounge than a dashboard, delivering a composed drive that keeps motorway monotony at bay. Tech is smart rather than showy, and the brand’s novel ownership options make it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric convenience without the usual headaches — plus it brings enough personality to make charging stops less boring.
details
Polestar 2
The Polestar 2 is a crisp, Scandinavian-styled electric liftback that pairs minimalist luxury with a focused, driver's attitude. It feels agile and composed whether you’re commuting or heading out for the weekend, with a tech-forward cabin and enough personality to make everyday driving a bit more fun.
details
NIO ET5
Polestar 2
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 58,700 £
|
Price
42,000 - 57,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.6 - 18.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 590 km
|
Electric Range
554 - 659 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
78 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,215 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
2,015 - 2,188 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
386 L
|
Trunk capacity
405 L
|
|
Length
4,790 mm
|
Length
4,606 mm
|
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
1,499 mm
|
Height
1,473 - 1,479 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,135 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,095 L
|
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Payload
375 - 421 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
490 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 476 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 km/h
|
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
Torque
490 - 740 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 350 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
NIO
|
Brand
Polestar
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.