VS

Nissan Juke vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Skoda Fabia?

Nissan Juke vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Fabia is noticeably cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Nissan Juke costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,080 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia offers moderately more power – delivering 177 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Fabia delivers a bit more torque with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is somewhat lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers marginally more boot space – 422 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Fabia carries marginally more – 437 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Fabia

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Nissan Juke
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you want a compact, city-friendly hatchback or a larger, more comfort- and tech-focused model. Below is a concise, practical comparison to help you weigh size, practicality, efficiency and driving character and pick the right …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
Choosing between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Fabia means deciding if you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and SUV styling or a practical, roomy hatchback that maximises interior space and efficiency. I’ll compare driving feel, comfort, boot space, running costs and equipment to …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Hyundai i20 is the sassy, tech-packed choice — peppy engines, crisp looks and a surprisingly upscale cabin for the money — while the Škoda Fabia plays the practical trump card with cavernous boot space, calm manners and a build-for-the-long-haul sensibility. If you want style and gadgetry that …
Dacia Sandero
Nissan Juke
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Nissan Juke both aim at buyers wanting compact, city-friendly cars, but they take very different approaches: the Sandero focuses on affordability and practical simplicity, while the Juke leans into distinctive styling and a more dynamic feel. This comparison will help you …
Dacia Duster
Nissan Juke
VS
Dacia Duster vs Nissan Juke — two small SUVs that answer different questions. The Duster is the straightforward, practical choice for buyers who want space and rugged capability for the money; the Juke is the sharper, more polished compact crossover aimed at style, refinement and tech in urban …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Nissan Juke
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Skoda
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.