Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Renault Kangoo Compact Van vs Mercedes Citan Transporter comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 21,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo Compact Van or Mercedes Citan Transporter?
Renault Kangoo Compact Van vs Mercedes Citan Transporter: Key differences
Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes Citan Transporter is slightly cheaper – starting at 21,700 £ , while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,432 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Citan Transporter uses 5.1 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Citan Transporter is only slightly more efficient: consuming 18.7 kWh/100km compared to 20.5 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Citan Transporter offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 290 km, about 6 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Citan Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Citan Transporter offers barely more power – delivering 131 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes Citan Transporter is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 11.7 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 270 Nm.
Kangoo Compact Van
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan Transporter is a bit lighter – 1,381 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 258 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries moderately more – 901 kg compared to 787 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes Citan Transporter is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £21,700
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
details
Mercedes Citan Transporter
The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
|
Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
|
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
0 - 156 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
|
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
|
|
Payload
670 - 901 kg
|
Payload
449 - 787 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.