Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Toyota Land Cruiser comparison
Compare performance (600 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (275,400 £ vs 72,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Rolls-Royce Cullinan or Toyota Land Cruiser?
Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Toyota Land Cruiser: Key differences
Cullinan
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota Land Cruiser is significantly cheaper – starting at 72,000 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 203,409 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Land Cruiser uses 10.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 5.4 L/100km.
Land Cruiser
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers substantially more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 395 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Toyota Land Cruiser takes 12.3 s. That’s about 7.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Toyota Land Cruiser offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Land Cruiser is somewhat lighter – 2,415 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota Land Cruiser offers clearly more boot space – 742 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 187 L.
When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries slightly more – 840 kg compared to 750 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Rolls-Royce Cullinan holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £275,400
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Toyota Land Cruiser
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.
details
Toyota Land Cruiser
The Toyota Land Cruiser is the kind of SUV that makes you feel ready to abandon the map and take the long way home, with legendary go-anywhere capability wrapped in reassuringly solid build quality. Inside it's surprisingly comfortable and grown-up — a practical luxury for buyers who want reliability and presence rather than fleeting flash.
details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Toyota Land Cruiser
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
|
Price
72,000 - 79,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
10.6 - 10.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
363 - 380 g/km
|
co2
278 - 282 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,660 kg
|
Curb weight
2,415 - 2,450 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
555 L
|
Trunk capacity
143 - 742 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,000 mm
|
Width
1,980 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
840 kg
|
Payload
685 - 750 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
|
Power HP
205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
|
Torque
500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
|
Power kW
151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,755 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.