Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Toyota Land Cruiser – Which model is better for everyday use?
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Toyota Land Cruiser?
Ranger
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Ranger has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £, while the Toyota Land Cruiser costs 70700 £. That’s a price difference of around 33180 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Toyota Land Cruiser with 10.60 L. The difference is about 7.50 L per 100 km.
Land Cruiser
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger has a evident edge – offering 292 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Toyota Land Cruiser takes 12.30 s. That’s about 4.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Ranger performs to a small extent better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Toyota Land Cruiser tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls noticeable stronger with 697 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 197 Nm difference.
Ranger
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Toyota Land Cruiser offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Ford Ranger is noticeable lighter – 2082 kg compared to 2610 kg. The difference is around 528 kg.
When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger decisively takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 568 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Ranger proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Ranger is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £37,500
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Ranger
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger stands out in the pickup market with its robust build and versatile capabilities, making it a popular choice for both work and leisure. Its modern design is complemented by a well-equipped interior, providing comfort and advanced technology. Whether tackling challenging terrains or cruising through the city, the Ranger delivers a reliable and dynamic driving experience.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Toyota Land Cruiser
The Toyota Land Cruiser is renowned for its robust durability and exceptional off-road capabilities. Its design combines a rugged exterior with a comfortable and functional interior, appealing to both adventure seekers and city drivers. The vehicle's reliability and advanced technology make it a popular choice for those who require a dependable SUV that can handle a variety of terrains with ease.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Ford Ranger
Toyota Land Cruiser
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37500 - 71900 £
|
Price
70700 - 79300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
10.6 - 10.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
278 - 284 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
2 - 4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
|
Curb weight
2610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
143 - 742 L
|
|
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
|
Length
4925 mm
|
|
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
|
Width
1980 mm
|
|
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
|
Height
1935 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1829 - 1895 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.30 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2755 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.