Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Skoda Superb Limousine vs BMW 5 Series Touring comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 727 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 53,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Superb Limousine or BMW 5 Series Touring?
Skoda Superb Limousine vs BMW 5 Series Touring: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Superb Limousine
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Superb Limousine is significantly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the BMW 5 Series Touring costs 53,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Limousine uses 1.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the BMW 5 Series Touring with 2.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers clearly more range – reaching up to 140 km, about 42 km more than the BMW 5 Series Touring.
5 Series Touring
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 5 Series Touring offers considerably more power – delivering 727 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 455 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 5 Series Touring is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Skoda Superb Limousine takes 5.6 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 5 Series Touring delivers considerably more torque with 1,000 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm more.
Superb Limousine
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Limousine is slightly lighter – 1,559 kg compared to 1,850 kg. The difference is around 291 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers a bit more boot space – 645 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW 5 Series Touring carries barely more – 620 kg compared to 580 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW 5 Series Touring comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £53,100
BMW 5 Series Touring
Skoda Superb Limousine
BMW 5 Series Touring
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Superb Limousine
The Skoda Superb is the quietly imposing saloon that turns everyday practicality into tasteful luxury, with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and a boot that swallows groceries and luggage with military discipline. For buyers who want executive presence without the badge snobbery, it’s a clever, polished choice that rewards sensible thinking with genuine comfort and pragmatic charm.
details
BMW 5 Series Touring
The BMW 5 Series Touring takes executive elegance and stretches it into a practical estate, marrying refined interior comfort with everyday usability. It drives with reassuring poise, offers plenty of space for luggage or a small life's worth of gear, and somehow manages to look sharper than most saloons in the car park — a compelling choice if you want luxury without surrendering practicality.
details
Skoda Superb Limousine
BMW 5 Series Touring
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,100 - 52,100 £
|
Price
53,100 - 126,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 6.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
131 - 140 km
|
Electric Range
65 - 98 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
26 - 175 g/km
|
co2
53 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,559 - 1,896 kg
|
Curb weight
1,850 - 2,550 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
486 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
Width
1,900 - 1,970 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
441 - 580 kg
|
Payload
500 - 620 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 727 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 7.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
330 - 1,000 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 535 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B, C
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
BMW
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.