VS

smart #3 vs Alpine A390 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 470 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 57,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – smart #3 or Alpine A390?

smart #3 vs Alpine A390: Key differences

smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
details

Alpine A390

  • considerably more power
  • somewhat more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

#3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

smart #3 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 42,000 £ , while the Alpine A390 costs 57,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,866 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the smart #3 is moderately more efficient: consuming 16.3 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Alpine A390. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Alpine A390 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 551 km, about 96 km more than the smart #3.

A390

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 offers considerably more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 198 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the smart #3 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A390 delivers considerably more torque with 824 Nm compared to 384 Nm. That’s about 440 Nm more.

#3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is somewhat lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,121 kg. The difference is around 311 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Alpine A390 offers markedly more boot space – 532 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.

When it comes to payload, the Alpine A390 carries barely more – 484 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A390 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £57,900
A390

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 497 - 551 km
smart #3
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

smart #3

The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.

details

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
smart #3
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

Price
42,000 £
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
455 km
Electric Range
497 - 551 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,810 kg
Curb weight
2,121 - 2,124 kg
Trunk capacity
370 L
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,844 mm
Width
1,885 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 kg
Payload
481 - 484 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
384 Nm
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
200 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
smart
Brand
Alpine
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.