Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
smart #3 vs Mercedes EQT comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – smart #3 or Mercedes EQT?
smart #3 vs Mercedes EQT: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
#3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes EQT is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,217 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the smart #3 is slightly more efficient: consuming 16.3 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 3.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the smart #3 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 177 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EQT
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 6.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers markedly more torque with 384 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 139 Nm more.
#3
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is marginally lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers visibly more boot space – 551 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 181 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries somewhat more – 531 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The smart #3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
£41,991
smart #3
smart #3
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
smart #3
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
smart #3
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,000 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
smart
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.