Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
SsangYong Korando vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (190 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Korando or Volvo S60?
SsangYong Korando vs Volvo S60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Korando
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SsangYong Korando is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,523 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Korando with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 6.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the SsangYong Korando offers clearly more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 245 km more than the Volvo S60.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers significantly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 265 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the SsangYong Korando takes 8.4 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the SsangYong Korando is marginally faster – reaching 191 km/h, while the Volvo S60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 349 Nm more.
Korando
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Korando is a bit lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 1,715 kg. The difference is around 198 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Korando offers clearly more boot space – 551 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 124 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo S60 carries marginally more – 475 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
SsangYong Korando
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
SsangYong Korando
The SsangYong Korando pairs bold, modern styling with a surprisingly roomy and practical cabin, so it looks confident at the lights and handles the daily grind without fuss. It swaps flashy badges for honest value, offering a composed ride, useful equipment and wallet-friendly running that make it an appealing pick for buyers who'd rather spend on weekends than on extravagant finance packages.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
SsangYong Korando
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 42,000 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
339 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 197 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,840 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
551 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
4,450 - 4,465 mm
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
1,620 - 1,645 mm
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,248 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 463 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 190 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
156 - 191 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
260 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 140 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.