VS

SsangYong Musso vs Volvo V60 comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (28,700 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Musso or Volvo V60?

SsangYong Musso vs Volvo V60: Key differences

SsangYong Musso

  • considerably cheaper
details

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

V60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

SsangYong Musso is considerably cheaper – starting at 28,700 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,715 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the SsangYong Musso with 8.4 L/100km. The difference is about 6.4 L/100km.

V60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers significantly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 148 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers noticeably more torque with 589 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 189 Nm more.

V60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo V60 is a bit lighter – 1,734 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 311 kg.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Musso carries significantly more – 1,010 kg compared to 506 kg. That’s a difference of about 504 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo V60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,400
V60

Volvo V60

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 350 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2 - 6.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 99 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo V60 is a sleek, premium estate built for refined cruising and carrying larger loads, while the Volvo XC40 is a compact SUV focused on city agility, practicality and a taller driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you want wagon-style space and long-distance comfort …
Volvo V60
Volvo V90
VS
The Volvo V60 and V90 are both premium station wagons but serve different needs: the V60 is a sportier, more compact option, while the V90 offers greater space and a more luxurious ride. Choose the V60 if you prioritise agility and city-friendly size; choose the V90 if you need rear-seat room, …
SsangYong Musso
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SsangYong Musso

The Musso is a no-nonsense pickup that blends rugged capability with surprisingly comfy cabin manners, perfect for buyers who want practicality over prestige. It may not turn heads at the coffee stop, but its sensible layout, useful load space and low running costs make it a very pragmatic choice for workdays and weekends.

details

Reviews SsangYong Musso

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo V60

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior

Reviews Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Michael Hauser
2 Oct 2025, 08:00:10

I drive a V60 T6 TE e‑AWD Inscription MY 2022

Overall I'm very satisfied with it.

Positives +
+ Safety
+ Performance
+ Fuel consumption
+ Service and running costs
+ Driving feel (still has a bit of the Swedish tank about it)
+ Average consumption 5.2 l/100 km

Negatives -
- 180 km/h limiter, supposedly due to excessive centrifugal forces on the electric motor
- Thinner side windows than the predecessor
- Still very firm suspension
- 8‑speed automatic (feels like the car is always shifting)
- Volvo's own customer service has massively deteriorated in recent years (their new motto seems to be "take it or leave it")

As a long‑time Volvo customer, this will be my last Volvo — I'm not willing to go along with the (now purely electric and largely China‑produced) madness.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Volvo V60
VS
We’re comparing the Skoda Octavia Combi and the Volvo V60 — two popular estate cars that appeal to buyers who need space and everyday usability without sacrificing comfort. Commonly called the Octavia Combi and the Volvo V60, they take different approaches: Skoda focuses on maximum practicality and …
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
Volvo V60
VS
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports and Volvo V60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Toyota …
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake
Volvo V60
VS
In the battle of stylish practicality, the Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake and Volvo V60 present two distinct philosophies for discerning drivers. The CLA impresses with its sleek design and sporty driving dynamics, making it a standout for those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. In contrast, …
Volvo V60
VW Passat
VS
The Volvo V60 and the VW Passat are two mid-size family cars that prioritize safety and practicality, but they take different approaches to comfort, design and driving feel. This comparison focuses on performance, interior quality, space, technology and running costs to help you decide which suits …
Audi A6 Avant
Volvo V60
VS
In the battle of practicality and luxury, the Audi A6 Avant stands out with its sleek design and advanced technology, offering a sporty driving experience alongside ample cargo space. Meanwhile, the Volvo V60 impresses with its commitment to safety and Scandinavian style, providing a comfortable …
Audi A5 Avant
Volvo V60
VS
Audi A5 Avant and Volvo V60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi A5 Avant or the Volvo …
SsangYong Musso
VW Amarok
VS
SsangYong Musso and VW Amarok go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the SsangYong Musso or the …
SsangYong Musso
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,700 - 42,700 £
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
Consumption L/100km
8.4 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
99 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
221 - 245 g/km
co2
45 - 141 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
75 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,260 kg
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
5,095 - 5,405 mm
Length
-
Width
1,950 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
1,840 - 1,855 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
785 - 1,010 kg
Payload
460 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
183 - 187 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
400 Nm
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
149 kW
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the SsangYong Musso?

The SsangYong Musso is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.