Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
SsangYong Rexton vs Volvo V90 comparison
Compare performance (202 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 62,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Volvo V90?
SsangYong Rexton vs Volvo V90: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Rexton
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
SsangYong Rexton is clearly cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Volvo V90 costs 62,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,171 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V90 uses 0.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 7.4 L/100km.
V90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V90 offers substantially more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 253 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 5.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the SsangYong Rexton is only slightly faster – reaching 184 km/h, while the Volvo V90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V90 delivers noticeably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 268 Nm more.
Rexton
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo V90 is marginally lighter – 2,075 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 70 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers noticeably more boot space – 784 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 296 L.
For maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,977 L, about 523 L more than the Volvo V90.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries clearly more – 770 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 255 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo V90 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £62,300
Volvo V90
SsangYong Rexton
Volvo V90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
SsangYong Rexton
The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.
details
Volvo V90
The Volvo V90 blends Scandinavian elegance with estate practicality, delivering a composed ride and an interior that's both luxurious and perfectly sensible. Packed with clever storage and top-flight safety kit, it's the choice for buyers who want to look classy while hauling life's chaos — without making a fuss about it.
details
SsangYong Rexton
Volvo V90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
|
Price
62,300 - 71,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
214 - 216 g/km
|
co2
18 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
|
Curb weight
2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
|
Trunk capacity
488 L
|
|
Length
4,850 mm
|
Length
4,945 mm
|
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
1,825 mm
|
Height
1,472 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,454 L
|
|
Payload
655 - 770 kg
|
Payload
515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
Power HP
398 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
184 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
441 Nm
|
Torque
659 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
148 kW
|
Power kW
293 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.