VS

Tesla Model S vs Alpine A390 comparison

Compare performance (1,020 HP vs 470 HP), boot space and price (94,300 £ vs 57,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Tesla Model S or Alpine A390?

Tesla Model S vs Alpine A390: Key differences

Tesla Model S

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Alpine A390

  • substantially cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Model S

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Alpine A390 is substantially cheaper – starting at 57,900 £ , while the Tesla Model S costs 94,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36,420 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model S is somewhat more efficient: consuming 16.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Alpine A390. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Tesla Model S offers visibly more range – reaching up to 744 km, about 193 km more than the Alpine A390.

A390

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model S offers considerably more power – delivering 1,020 HP compared to 470 HP. That’s roughly 550 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model S is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2.1 s, while the Alpine A390 takes 3.9 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

Model S

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model S is very slightly lighter – 2,092 kg compared to 2,121 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model S offers clearly more boot space – 799 L compared to 532 L. That’s a difference of about 267 L.

When it comes to payload, the Alpine A390 carries only slightly more – 484 kg compared to 442 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model S holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £94,300
Model S

Tesla Model S

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 670 - 1,020 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.8 - 18 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 744 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BMW i4
Alpine A390
VS
The BMW i4 and the Alpine A390 are two very different propositions: the i4 delivers electric-powered refinement and everyday usability, while the Alpine A390 focuses on lightweight, driver-focused sportiness. This comparison will cut through the noise so you can quickly see which car better matches …
CUPRA Tavascan
Alpine A390
VS
CUPRA Tavascan and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the CUPRA Tavascan or the …
Tesla Model S
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Tesla Model S

The Tesla Model S glides like a luxury sedan from the future, delivering instant shove and serene highway composure that make it feel equally at home on a rush-hour commute or a long-distance cruise. Inside, its minimalist cabin and gadget-forward interface turn every drive into a tech demo, making it as much a statement piece as a practical choice — and one that still manages to feel a little bit magical.

details
0x0-ModelS_01
0x0-ModelS_04
0x0-ModelS_03
0x0-ModelS_17
0x0-ModelS_07
0x0-ModelSPlaid-2
0x0-ModelS_16

Reviews Tesla Model S

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
jp Breugem
16 Dec 2025, 09:38:32

Reliable — now with nearly 400,000 km on the Model S, I’ve experienced few to no problems. Still using free Supercharging, it delivers a dependable, luxurious driving experience. Average consumption about 16 kWh/100 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
serpimg_Yl24Nh

Reviews Alpine A390

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Rafale
Alpine A390
VS
The Renault Rafale and the Alpine A390 pit two different approaches to sporty French motoring against each other: the Rafale leans toward a sleek, tech-rich grand-tourer crossover, while the A390 is aimed at lightweight, driver-focused performance in traditional Alpine fashion. This comparison will …
Porsche Macan
Alpine A390
VS
Porsche Macan and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Porsche Macan or the …
BMW iX3
Alpine A390
VS
BMW iX3 and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW iX3 or the Alpine A390 is …
XPeng P7
Tesla Model S
VS
XPeng P7 and Tesla Model S go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the XPeng P7 or the Tesla Model …
BYD Seal
Tesla Model S
VS
BYD Seal and Tesla Model S go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Seal or the Tesla Model …
Alpine A290
Alpine A390
VS
Alpine A290 and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the Alpine …
Renault Scénic
Alpine A390
VS
Renault Scénic and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Scénic or the …
Skoda Enyaq
Tesla Model S
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Tesla Model S go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Enyaq or the Tesla …
Tesla Model S
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption
Price
94,300 - 102,800 £
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 18 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
611 - 744 km
Electric Range
497 - 551 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,092 - 2,197 kg
Curb weight
2,121 - 2,124 kg
Trunk capacity
799 L
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
5,021 mm
Length
-
Width
1,987 mm
Width
1,885 mm
Height
1,431 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,828 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 442 kg
Payload
481 - 484 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
670 - 1,020 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.1 - 3.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
240 - 322 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
493 - 750 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Tesla
Brand
Alpine
What drivetrain options does the Tesla Model S have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.