Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Volvo S60 vs Mercedes EQT comparison
Compare performance (455 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (42,500 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo S60 or Mercedes EQT?
Volvo S60 vs Mercedes EQT: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
S60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQT is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,740 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQT offers significantly more range – reaching up to 278 km, about 184 km more than the Volvo S60.
EQT
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers significantly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 333 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Volvo S60 is visibly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers considerably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 464 Nm more.
S60
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is somewhat lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 210 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers visibly more boot space – 551 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 124 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries a bit more – 531 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Volvo S60
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Volvo S60
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.