VS

Volvo S60 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (455 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (42,500 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo S60 or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Volvo S60 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Volvo S60

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • visibly more power
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo S60 is substantially cheaper – starting at 42,500 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 232,886 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 15.3 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers visibly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 455 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers visibly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 709 Nm. That’s about 191 Nm more.

S60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is considerably lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 945 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers markedly more boot space – 555 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 128 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries significantly more – 840 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 365 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo S60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,500
S60

Volvo S60

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 94 km
Volvo S60
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Volvo S60

The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Volvo S60
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
94 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
16 - 161 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
4,778 mm
Length
-
Width
1,850 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
1,431 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
461 - 475 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.