Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Volvo S60 vs SsangYong Rexton comparison
Compare performance (455 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (42,500 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo S60 or SsangYong Rexton?
Volvo S60 vs SsangYong Rexton: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
S60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SsangYong Rexton is barely cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,380 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 7.5 L/100km.
Rexton
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 253 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the SsangYong Rexton is very slightly faster – reaching 184 km/h, while the Volvo S60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers visibly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 268 Nm more.
S60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is visibly lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 430 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers clearly more boot space – 784 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 357 L.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries clearly more – 770 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 295 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Volvo S60
SsangYong Rexton
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
SsangYong Rexton
The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.
details
Volvo S60
SsangYong Rexton
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
co2
214 - 216 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
|
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
Length
4,850 mm
|
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
Height
1,825 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
|
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Payload
655 - 770 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
184 km/h
|
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
148 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.