Compare performance (150 HP vs 180 HP), boot space and price (25,800 £ vs 30,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Caddy Compact Van or Fiat Scudo?
In the world of compact cargo vans, the Fiat Scudo and Volkswagen's Caddy Kompaktvan emerge as two leading contenders. Both models flaunt an impressive balance of innovation, performance, and utility. Here's a detailed comparison to help you discern which van stands out where it matters most.
The Fiat Scudo offers a diverse engine lineup, including diesel and electric variants. With power outputs ranging between 101 and 180 HP for diesel, and up to 177 HP for electric motors, the Scudo caters to both traditionalists and those leaning toward green technology. These engines are matched with either a manual or an automatic gearbox, prioritizing versatility and control.
In comparison, the VW Caddy Kompaktvan takes a slightly different approach, featuring petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrid options. Power outputs range from 102 to 150 HP. The VW offers both manual and advanced dual-clutch automatic transmissions, ensuring smooth transitions and enhanced driving pleasure.
Fuel efficiency is a notable strength for VW, with the Caddy Kompaktvan achieving consumption figures as low as 5.3 L/100km for its petrol and diesel models, and a mere 0.5 L/100km for its hybrid version. Scudo's diesel consumption varies between 6.5 and 7.8 L/100km, with electric consumption fluctuating between 23.6 and 27 kWh/100km, offering an electric range of up to 352 km.
Dimension-wise, the Scudo stretches from 4,609 mm to 5,309 mm in length, providing ample space for toolkit and goods. Its payload capacity tops at 1,333 kg, furthered by a robust build with curb weights between 1,616 kg and 2,260 kg.
The Caddy Kompaktvan is slightly more compact, ranging from 4,500 mm to 4,853 mm in length. It offers a maximum payload of 759 kg and curb weights from 1,442 kg to 1,818 kg, making it an agile and maneuverable choice ideal for urban deliveries.
Fiat's Scudo offers various seating configurations, accommodating between 2 to 6 seats, depending on specific model setups. This flexibility can appeal to both cargo transport and team travel needs.
Conversely, the Caddy Kompaktvan maintains a straightforward approach with a 2-seater configuration, focused on maximizing cargo space rather than passenger transport.
The Scudo's embrace of electric powertrains signals Fiat's commitment to innovation and sustainability, while its versatile transmission options address diverse driving preferences. Additionally, the inclusion of a maximum speed of up to 185 km/h demonstrates an ability to swiftly handle longer hauls.
Volkswagen responds with the Caddy Kompaktvan's advanced dual-clutch automatic setup, promising enhanced driving dynamics and a finely tuned experience. The inclusion of plug-in hybrid technology not only offers superior fuel efficiency but also reduces the vehicle's environmental footprint.
Both the Fiat Scudo and the VW Caddy Kompaktvan present compelling features tailored to specific needs. The Scudo’s flexibility and electric range make it appealing for businesses focused on versatile operations and sustainability. Meanwhile, the Caddy's fuel efficiency and innovative transmission solutions provide a fine balance between performance and economy. Thus, your ultimate choice hinges on personal priorities, be it capacity, fuel preference, or tech advancements.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Caddy Compact Van is a bit cheaper – starting at 25,800 £ , while the Fiat Scudo costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy Compact Van uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Fiat Scudo with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 5.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Fiat Scudo offers considerably more range – reaching up to 352 km, about 232 km more than the VW Caddy Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Fiat Scudo offers slightly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Fiat Scudo delivers moderately more torque with 400 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Fiat Scudo offers more seats – 8 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is a bit lighter – 1,442 kg compared to 1,722 kg. The difference is around 280 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Fiat Scudo carries substantially more – 1,805 kg compared to 759 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,046 kg.
The VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
The Fiat Scudo is a practical and unpretentious van that balances hardworking utility with a surprisingly polished cabin, making it a sensible choice for tradespeople and families who need space without fuss. It doesn't pretend to be flashy, but its clever packaging, sensible driving manners and affordable running costs make the Scudo a dependable partner for the daily grind and weekend projects — and it even manages to look tidy in the car park.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,800 - 42,300 £
|
Price
30,900 - 51,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 7.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
|
Electric Range
221 - 352 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 - 187 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van, Bus
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
2 - 8
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,818 kg
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,260 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 800 L
|
|
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,920 - 2,010 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,823 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 3,700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
628 - 759 kg
|
Payload
840 - 1,805 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España