What drivetrain options does the VW Polo have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo reaches a peak output of 207 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the VW Polo use?

On average, the VW Polo consumes 5.10 L.

What are the dimensions of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo measures 4074 mm long, 1751 mm wide and 1451 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the MG HS/EHS have?

The MG HS/EHS is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the MG HS/EHS's engine?

Up to 272 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the MG HS/EHS in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 0.50 L.

What is the MG HS/EHS’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 100 km.

What are the dimensions of the MG HS/EHS?

Overall, the MG HS/EHS is 4655 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1664 mm high.

VW Polo vs MG HS/EHS - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW Polo has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the MG HS/EHS costs 24000 £. That’s a price difference of around 6990 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.10 L. The difference is about 4.60 L per 100 km.

Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the MG HS/EHS takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs to a small extent better – reaching 240 km/h, while the MG HS/EHS tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 45 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS/EHS pulls minimal stronger with 350 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

Polo

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Polo is significantly lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1625 kg. The difference is around 482 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG HS/EHS offers evident more room – 507 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 156 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG HS/EHS performs noticeable better – up to 1484 L, which is about 359 L more than the VW Polo.

When it comes to payload, VW Polo a bit takes the win – 457 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG HS/EHS proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG HS/EHS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews VW Polo

Reviews MG HS/EHS

5 (1 Reviews)

Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Top Car Comparisons

VW Polo

VW Taigo

VS

When comparing the VW Polo to the VW Taigo, drivers will appreciate the Polo's compact size and agility, making it a perfect fit for urban environments. Conversely, the Taigo stands out with its sleek coupe-inspired SUV design, offering a slightly elevated driving position and increased cargo space …

Toyota Yaris

VW Polo

VS

In the compact car showdown, the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo both make compelling cases, each boasting its own unique strengths. The Yaris shines with its impressive fuel efficiency and dependable reliability, making it a practical choice for everyday driving. On the other hand, the Polo …

Costs and Consumption
Price 17000 - 30400 £	Price 24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L	Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 100 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 116 - 148 g/km	co2 14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 40 L	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Hatchback	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1143 - 1378 kg	Curb weight 1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity 351 L	Trunk capacity 441 - 507 L
Length 4074 mm	Length 4655 - 4670 mm
Width 1751 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height 1431 - 1451 mm	Height 1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity 1125 L	Max trunk capacity 1291 - 1484 L
Payload 432 - 457 kg	Payload 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 80 - 207 HP	Power HP 170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.5 - 15.6 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed 171 - 240 km/h	Max Speed 190 - 195 km/h
Torque 93 - 320 Nm	Torque 275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 59 - 152 kW	Power kW 125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 1496 cm3