Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Abarth 500 595 695 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport – Which car suits you better?
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 500 595 695 or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
500 595 695
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Abarth 500 595 695 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32600 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 78600 £. That’s a price difference of around 46038 £.
As for range, the Abarth 500 595 695 performs decisively better – achieving up to 265 km, about 147 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Range Rover Sport
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clearly edge – offering 635 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 480 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Abarth 500 595 695 takes 7 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs convincingly better – reaching 290 km/h, while the Abarth 500 595 695 tops out at 155 km/h. The difference is around 135 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Sport pulls decisively stronger with 800 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 565 Nm difference.
500 595 695
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Abarth 500 595 695 is clearly lighter – 1410 kg compared to 2390 kg. The difference is around 980 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers decisively more room – 647 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 462 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs decisively better – up to 1491 L, which is about 941 L more than the Abarth 500 595 695.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport convincingly takes the win – 830 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 445 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £78,600
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Abarth 500 595 695
The Abarth 500, particularly in its 595 and 695 renditions, captures the spirit of Italian motoring with its compact yet aggressive design. Known for its lively performance and distinctive styling, this little powerhouse is a joy to drive, offering an engaging experience that appeals to enthusiasts. With its rich motorsport heritage, the Abarth 500 embodies the essence of fun and excitement on both the streets and the race track.
details
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport exudes a commanding presence, combining luxury with exceptional off-road capabilities. Its sleek, modern design is complemented by a meticulously crafted interior that offers both comfort and advanced technology. With its powerful performance and refined handling, this vehicle is ideal for both urban environments and adventurous terrains.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Abarth 500 595 695
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
|
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32600 - 39400 £
|
Price
78600 - 175700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
37.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
61 - 266 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
3
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1410 - 1435 kg
|
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
185 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
3673 mm
|
Length
4946 - 4970 mm
|
|
Width
1682 mm
|
Width
2043 mm
|
|
Height
1518 mm
|
Height
1814 - 1820 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
550 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
|
|
Payload
370 - 385 kg
|
Payload
640 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
155 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
155 km/h
|
Max Speed
206 - 290 km/h
|
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
114 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Abarth
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Abarth 500 595 695 offered with different drivetrains?
The Abarth 500 595 695 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.