VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-80 meets Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 78600 £. That’s a price difference of around 30386 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport with 2.70 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs significantly better – achieving up to 118 km, about 57 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Range Rover Sport @ media.landrover.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clearly edge – offering 635 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 308 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs evident better – reaching 290 km/h, while the Mazda CX-80 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 71 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Sport pulls noticeable stronger with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

CX-80 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2390 kg. The difference is around 259 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers significantly more room – 647 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 389 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs noticeable better – up to 1971 L, which is about 480 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport clearly perceptible takes the win – 830 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £78,600
RRS_SE_D300_23MY_070922_01

Land Rover Range Rover Sport

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 249 - 635 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.7 - 11.7 L
  • Electric Range : 116 - 118 km
details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ newsroom.mazda.com
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ newsroom.mazda.com
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Land Rover Range Rover Sport

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport exudes a commanding presence, combining luxury with exceptional off-road capabilities. Its sleek, modern design is complemented by a meticulously crafted interior that offers both comfort and advanced technology. With its powerful performance and refined handling, this vehicle is ideal for both urban environments and adventurous terrains.

details
RRS_SE_D300_23MY_070922_01 @ media.landrover.com
RRS_First_Edition_P530_23MY_070922_02_0 @ media.landrover.com
RRS_First_Edition_P530_23MY_070922_18_0 @ media.landrover.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference in style versus functionality, as both models cater to the needs of modern families.
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. Ultimately, both vehicles deliver strong performance, making the choice lean heavily on personal style and desired driving experience.
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
CX-80
Range Rover Sport

Costs and Consumption
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Price
78600 - 175700 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
61 km
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
co2
35 - 151 g/km
co2
61 - 266 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
647 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4946 - 4970 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
2043 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1814 - 1820 mm
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
640 - 830 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
206 - 290 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and functionality. While the CX-80 highlights Mazda's commitment to driving pleasure, the Kodiaq shines as a dependable all-rounder tailored to meet everyday needs.
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive choice for families. Ultimately, the decision between the two may hinge on personal preference for sportiness versus practicality, but both models deliver solid performance in their respective strengths.
Mercedes GLE
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
In the battle of luxury SUVs, the Mercedes GLE and Land Rover Range Rover Sport stand out with their distinct characteristics and capabilities. The GLE impresses with its advanced technology and refined interior, catering to those who prioritize comfort and innovation. Meanwhile, the Range Rover Sport shines in off-road prowess and rugged elegance, appealing to adventure seekers looking for both luxury and performance.
BMW X5
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW X5 offers a blend of performance and opulence with its powerful engine options, refined interior, and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the new Mazda CX-80 presents a compelling alternative, delivering a spacious yet elegant cabin and Mazda's signature driving dynamics at a more accessible price point. Each vehicle caters to distinct tastes: the X5 appeals to those prioritizing prestige and tech-forward features, while the CX-80 is ideal for those seeking a stylish, value-oriented choice.
Hyundai Santa Fe
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Mazda CX-80
VS
Jeep Wrangler
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.