What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 4 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 60 km.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

Is the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offered with different drivetrains?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Land Rover Range Rover Sport's engine?

Depending on the version, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport delivers up to 635 HP.

How much fuel does the Land Rover Range Rover Sport use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 2.70 L.

What is the electric driving range of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport?

According to WLTP, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport can travel up to 118 km on a single charge.

What is the Land Rover Range Rover Sport’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 647 L fit inside.

What are the Land Rover Range Rover Sport’s length, width and height?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport measures 4970 mm long, 2043 mm wide and 1814 mm high.

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 78600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29272 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Sport manages with 2.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs significantly better – achieving up to 118 km, about 58 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Range Rover Sport

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clearly edge – offering 635 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 308 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Sport pulls noticeable stronger with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2390 kg. The difference is around 259 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers significantly more room – 647 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 389 L.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport clearly perceptible takes the win – 830 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-80

Toyota Highlander

VS

In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …

Mazda CX-80

VW Tayron

VS

In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …

Costs and Consumption
Price 49300 - 61400 £	Price 78600 - 175700 £
Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km 2.7 - 11.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 60 km	Electric Range 116 - 118 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 91 - 146 g/km	co2 61 - 266 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 90 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 7	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg	Curb weight 2390 - 2810 kg
Trunk capacity 258 L	Trunk capacity 647 L
Length -	Length 4970 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 2043 mm
Height -	Height 1814 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1491 L
Payload 649 - 650 kg	Payload 640 - 830 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 254 - 327 HP	Power HP 249 - 635 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.8 - 7.7 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 290 km/h
Torque 500 - 550 Nm	Torque 570 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 6 - 8
Power kW 187 - 241 kW	Power kW 183 - 467 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 2997 - 4395 cm3