VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 635 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 78,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • considerably cheaper
  • slightly lighter

Land Rover Range Rover Sport

  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 is considerably cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 78,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,272 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses 2.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers substantially more range – reaching up to 118 km, about 58 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Range Rover Sport

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers clearly more power – delivering 635 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 308 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport delivers noticeably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,390 kg. The difference is around 259 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers considerably more boot space – 647 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 389 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport carries noticeably more – 830 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £78,600
Range Rover Sport

Land Rover Range Rover Sport

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 249 - 635 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.7 - 11.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 116 - 118 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport

The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.

details
RRS_SE_D300_23MY_070922_01
RRS_First_Edition_P530_23MY_070922_02_0
RRS_First_Edition_P530_23MY_070922_18_0

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Sport

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Mercedes GLE
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
In the battle of luxury SUVs, the Mercedes GLE and Land Rover Range Rover Sport stand out with their distinct characteristics and capabilities. The GLE impresses with its advanced technology and refined interior, catering to those who prioritize comfort and innovation. Meanwhile, the Range Rover …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Land Rover Defender
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
In the battle of Land Rover icons, the Defender and the Range Rover Sport each showcase unique prowess on and off the road. The Defender excels with its rugged design and impressive off-road capabilities, perfect for adventurous souls seeking boundless exploration. Meanwhile, the Range Rover Sport …
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
In the rugged duel between the Ford Ranger and the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, both vehicles exhibit distinct strengths tailored to diverse needs. The Ford Ranger, a renowned pickup, shines with its robust towing capacity and off-road versatility, ideal for drivers seeking rugged practicality. …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
78,600 - 175,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
61 - 266 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,390 - 2,810 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
647 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
2,043 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
640 - 830 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.