In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty handling, appealing to those seeking a more dynamic driving experience.
The SUV segment continues to evolve, with manufacturers like Hyundai and Mazda producing versatile and innovative models that cater to a range of drivers. This comparison of the Hyundai Santa Fe and the Mazda CX-80 highlights the strengths and attributes of each offering, providing potential buyers with a comprehensive overview to aid their decision-making.
The Hyundai Santa Fe comes with a choice of powertrains that includes both full hybrid and plugin hybrid options, delivering an output of 215 to 253 HP. The Santa Fe also impresses with torque figures of up to 367 Nm, making it capable for both urban and rugged terrains. Its automatic gearbox provides a smooth driving experience whether navigating busy streets or taking on longer journeys. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges between 9.3 to 9.8 seconds, indicative of its respectable performance.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-80 pushes performance benchmarks higher with its available diesel MHEV and plugin hybrid engines, boasting a remarkable output of up to 327 HP and torque peaking at an impressive 550 Nm. This enables the CX-80 to achieve acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 6.8 seconds, positioning it as a sportier contender in this comparison. The CX-80's all-wheel-drive configuration enhances traction and stability, appealing to those seeking adventure without compromising on performance.
When it comes to efficiency, the Hyundai Santa Fe shines with a fuel consumption rate ranging from 1.7 to 6.9 L/100km depending on the selected powertrain, while achieving a CO2 emissions rating as low as 145 g/km. Its electric range of 54 km for the hybrid models allows for short local trips without relying heavily on the combustion engine.
The Mazda CX-80 edges ahead in the efficiency race with fuel consumption figures as low as 1.6 L/100km in its plugin hybrid variant, along with CO2 emissions starting at a mere 35 g/km. With an electric range of up to 60 km, it provides a competitive solution for eco-conscious drivers looking to reduce their carbon footprint.
Both vehicles offer spacious interiors, accommodating 5 to 7 passengers. The Hyundai Santa Fe provides a trunk capacity that ranges from 621 to 711 liters, making it ideal for families and road trips. Its design focuses on comfort with user-friendly technology and a comforting cabin feel, catering to both driver and passengers.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-80 features a slightly larger exterior dimension with a length of 4995 mm and an official trunk capacity of 258 liters. Although it has less cargo space than the Santa Fe, the stylish design and high-quality materials used in the CX-80 contribute to a premium interior experience, showcasing Mazda's commitment to craftsmanship. The CX-80 also includes several modern technological advancements and driver assistance systems that enhance comfort and safety.
Safety is paramount in both SUVs. The Hyundai Santa Fe is packed with advanced driver assistance features such as lane keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, and a comprehensive set of airbags. These elements provide peace of mind for families and individual drivers alike.
The Mazda CX-80 doesn't fall short either, offering a suite of safety technologies such as adaptive LED headlights, blind-spot monitoring, and lane departure warning, which work in tandem to create a safe driving atmosphere. Both models strive to ensure high safety ratings, giving buyers confidence in their investment.
Choosing between the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If you are seeking a hybrid option with excellent efficiency and a spacious interior, the Santa Fe may catch your eye. Conversely, for those enamored with high performance and striking design, the Mazda CX-80 proves to be a compelling alternative.
With features tailored to frenetic urban lifestyles and tranquil road trips alike, both vehicles present an array of innovative options that make them worthy contenders in the competitive SUV market. Test driving each model will ultimately help potential buyers make the most informed decision.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 48600 - 58400
£
|
Price
about 47400 - 59400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 6.9
L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
54
km
|
Electric Range
60
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
38 - 167
g/km
|
co2
35 - 148
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
67
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
7
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1920 - 2165
kg
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240
kg
|
Trunk capacity
621 - 711
L
|
Trunk capacity
258
L
|
Length
4830
mm
|
Length
4995
mm
|
Width
1900
mm
|
Width
1890
mm
|
Height
1720
mm
|
Height
1714
mm
|
Payload
560 - 665
kg
|
Payload
649 - 650
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
215 - 253
HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 9.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4
s
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Torque
367
Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Power kW
158 - 186
kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241
kW
|
Engine capacity
1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283
cm3
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
Top speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.