Compare performance (507 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (70600 £ vs 49300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q7 or Mazda CX-80?
In the competitive world of luxury SUVs, two contenders that have been getting a lot of attention are the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80. Both vehicles boast a blend of performance, comfort, and sophistication wrapped in an appealing package. But how do they stack up against each other? Let’s dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set them apart.
The Audi Q7 offers a wide array of engine options, catering to various preferences with its diesel MHEV, plug-in hybrid, petrol MHEV, and petrol engines. The power output ranges impressively from 231 HP to a staggering 507 HP, ensuring a robust performance no matter the choice. This SUV also boasts an electrifying acceleration capability, sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 4.1 seconds for its sportier versions.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-80 is offered with either a plug-in hybrid or a diesel MHEV engine. While its power outputs, at 327 HP and 254 HP, are slightly lower than the top-tier Q7 models, it still manages to deliver notable performance. The CX-80 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 6.8 seconds with its more powerful hybrid engine, providing a balanced mix of power and efficiency.
Fuel efficiency is where both these SUVs shine in different ways. The Audi Q7's plug-in hybrid variant achieves an astonishing consumption rate of 1.2 L/100 km with an electric range of up to 84 km, providing a sustainable option for those conscious of their carbon footprint. Its impressive battery capacity of 22 kWh further supports this effort.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-80's plug-in hybrid also promises strong efficiency, consuming 1.6 L/100 km with a pure electric range of 60 km. Its slightly smaller battery capacity and range are offset by practical fuel consumption figures, particularly for longer journeys.
Audi’s commitment to technological innovation can be seen in the Q7's array of features. With all-wheel drive as standard and an option for a sports differential, the driving dynamics are top-notch. The Q7 excels with its cutting-edge MMI infotainment system, digital cockpit, and numerous advanced driver assistance systems.
The Mazda CX-80, while slightly less opulent, still offers a compelling technology suite. Its all-wheel drive capability ensures a smooth ride, and the automatic transmission provides seamless shifts. While its infotainment and navigation systems are robust, it focuses more on delivering a more straightforward and practical driving experience.
When it comes to interior space and practicality, the Audi Q7 generally leads the way with a trunk capacity ranging from 563 L to 887 L, offering versatility in cargo handling. The available 5 to 7-seat configurations make it adaptable for various needs.
The Mazda CX-80, with a consistent 7-seat configuration, offers a modest trunk capacity of 258 L, focused more on passenger comfort rather than cargo space. Its dimensions, slightly more compact than the Q7, make it easier to maneuver in tighter urban environments.
Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q7 and Mazda CX-80 comes down to preference and priority. The Audi Q7 positions itself as a leader in luxury, performance, and technology, suitable for those who desire a high-performing and versatile SUV. On the flip side, the Mazda CX-80 appeals to those who value efficiency, simplicity, and a subtle blend of style and practicality.
Both vehicles reflect the evolving demands of modern buyers, proving that neither has to compromise on excellence, even if their paths to success are slightly different.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-80 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £ , while the Audi Q7 costs 70600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21300 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q7 manages with 3.80 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q7 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 82 km, about 22 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q7 has a noticeable edge – offering 507 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 180 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q7 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.10 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q7 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 770 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In curb weight, Audi Q7 is barely noticeable lighter – 2055 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 76 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q7 offers clearly more room – 887 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 629 L.
When it comes to payload, Audi Q7 noticeable takes the win – 885 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 235 kg.
The Audi Q7 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q7 cuts an imposing figure on the road, balancing restrained luxury with a spacious, tech-rich cabin that makes long journeys feel effortless. It rides with confident composure and polished manners, so if you want a premium family SUV that feels grown-up and worth the badge, the Q7 is a persuasive choice — even the in-laws will be impressed.
details
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
70600 - 100600 £
|
Price
49300 - 61400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 11.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 - 82 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
86 - 271 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2055 - 2460 kg
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
563 - 887 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1970 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
640 - 885 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
231 - 507 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 7.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 770 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
170 - 373 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2967 - 3996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España