@ Audi AG
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Audi Q7 vs Mazda CX-80 – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q7 or Mazda CX-80?

Q7 @ Audi AG

The Battle of the SUVs: Audi Q7 vs. Mazda CX-80

In the competitive world of luxury SUVs, two contenders that have been getting a lot of attention are the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80. Both vehicles boast a blend of performance, comfort, and sophistication wrapped in an appealing package. But how do they stack up against each other? Let’s dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set them apart.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine Options and Performance

The Audi Q7 offers a wide array of engine options, catering to various preferences with its diesel MHEV, plug-in hybrid, petrol MHEV, and petrol engines. The power output ranges impressively from 231 HP to a staggering 507 HP, ensuring a robust performance no matter the choice. This SUV also boasts an electrifying acceleration capability, sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 4.1 seconds for its sportier versions.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-80 is offered with either a plug-in hybrid or a diesel MHEV engine. While its power outputs, at 327 HP and 254 HP, are slightly lower than the top-tier Q7 models, it still manages to deliver notable performance. The CX-80 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 6.8 seconds with its more powerful hybrid engine, providing a balanced mix of power and efficiency.

Q7 @ Audi AG

Fuel Efficiency and Range

Fuel efficiency is where both these SUVs shine in different ways. The Audi Q7's plug-in hybrid variant achieves an astonishing consumption rate of 1.2 L/100 km with an electric range of up to 84 km, providing a sustainable option for those conscious of their carbon footprint. Its impressive battery capacity of 22 kWh further supports this effort.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-80's plug-in hybrid also promises strong efficiency, consuming 1.6 L/100 km with a pure electric range of 60 km. Its slightly smaller battery capacity and range are offset by practical fuel consumption figures, particularly for longer journeys.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Driving Experience and Technology

Audi’s commitment to technological innovation can be seen in the Q7's array of features. With all-wheel drive as standard and an option for a sports differential, the driving dynamics are top-notch. The Q7 excels with its cutting-edge MMI infotainment system, digital cockpit, and numerous advanced driver assistance systems.

The Mazda CX-80, while slightly less opulent, still offers a compelling technology suite. Its all-wheel drive capability ensures a smooth ride, and the automatic transmission provides seamless shifts. While its infotainment and navigation systems are robust, it focuses more on delivering a more straightforward and practical driving experience.

Q7 @ Audi AG

Space, Comfort, and Practicality

When it comes to interior space and practicality, the Audi Q7 generally leads the way with a trunk capacity ranging from 563 L to 887 L, offering versatility in cargo handling. The available 5 to 7-seat configurations make it adaptable for various needs.

The Mazda CX-80, with a consistent 7-seat configuration, offers a modest trunk capacity of 258 L, focused more on passenger comfort rather than cargo space. Its dimensions, slightly more compact than the Q7, make it easier to maneuver in tighter urban environments.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Luxury with a Purpose

Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q7 and Mazda CX-80 comes down to preference and priority. The Audi Q7 positions itself as a leader in luxury, performance, and technology, suitable for those who desire a high-performing and versatile SUV. On the flip side, the Mazda CX-80 appeals to those who value efficiency, simplicity, and a subtle blend of style and practicality.

Both vehicles reflect the evolving demands of modern buyers, proving that neither has to compromise on excellence, even if their paths to success are slightly different.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q7 @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Audi Q7 costs 69300 £. That’s a price difference of around 21128 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q7 manages with 1.20 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Audi Q7 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 84 km, about 23 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q7 has a noticeable edge – offering 507 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 180 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q7 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.10 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q7 performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-80 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q7 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 770 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q7 is barely noticeable lighter – 2055 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 76 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q7 offers clearly more room – 887 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 629 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q7 performs to a small extent better – up to 2255 L, which is about 284 L more than the Mazda CX-80.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q7 noticeable takes the win – 885 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 235 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi Q7 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £69,300
Q7 @ Audi AG

Audi Q7

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 231 - 507 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.2 - 11.9 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 84 km

Audi Q7

The Audi Q7 cuts an imposing figure on the road, balancing restrained luxury with a spacious, tech-rich cabin that makes long journeys feel effortless. It rides with confident composure and polished manners, so if you want a premium family SUV that feels grown-up and worth the badge, the Q7 is a persuasive choice — even the in-laws will be impressed.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
Q7 @ Audi AG
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
69300 - 99000 £
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 11.9 L
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
83 - 84 km
Electric Range
61 km
Battery Capacity
22 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
28 - 271 g/km
co2
35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
75 - 85 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2055 - 2460 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
563 - 887 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
5072 mm
Length
4995 mm
Width
1970 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1703 - 1735 mm
Height
1714 mm
Max trunk capacity
1863 - 2255 L
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Payload
640 - 885 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
231 - 507 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
226 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Torque
500 - 770 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
170 - 373 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
2967 - 3996 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
Is the Audi Q7 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.