Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Abarth 500 595 695 vs SsangYong Korando comparison
Compare performance (155 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (32,600 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 500 595 695 or SsangYong Korando?
Abarth 500 595 695 vs SsangYong Korando: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
500 595 695
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SsangYong Korando is markedly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Abarth 500 595 695 costs 32,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,571 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the SsangYong Korando is barely more efficient: consuming 16.8 kWh/100km compared to 17.1 kWh/100km for the Abarth 500 595 695. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the SsangYong Korando offers clearly more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 74 km more than the Abarth 500 595 695.
Korando
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Korando offers somewhat more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Abarth 500 595 695 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the SsangYong Korando takes 8.4 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Korando delivers markedly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 125 Nm more.
500 595 695
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: SsangYong Korando offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Abarth 500 595 695 is very slightly lighter – 1,410 kg compared to 1,517 kg. The difference is around 107 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Korando offers considerably more boot space – 551 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 366 L.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Korando carries somewhat more – 463 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The SsangYong Korando is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
SsangYong Korando
Abarth 500 595 695
SsangYong Korando
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Abarth 500 595 695
The Abarth 500, particularly in its 595 and 695 renditions, captures the spirit of Italian motoring with its compact yet aggressive design. Known for its lively performance and distinctive styling, this little powerhouse is a joy to drive, offering an engaging experience that appeals to enthusiasts. With its rich motorsport heritage, the Abarth 500 embodies the essence of fun and excitement on both the streets and the race track.
details
SsangYong Korando
The SsangYong Korando pairs bold, modern styling with a surprisingly roomy and practical cabin, so it looks confident at the lights and handles the daily grind without fuss. It swaps flashy badges for honest value, offering a composed ride, useful equipment and wallet-friendly running that make it an appealing pick for buyers who'd rather spend on weekends than on extravagant finance packages.
details
Abarth 500 595 695
SsangYong Korando
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,600 - 38,600 £
|
Price
27,000 - 42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
|
Electric Range
339 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 197 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,410 - 1,435 kg
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,840 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
185 L
|
Trunk capacity
551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,450 - 4,465 mm
|
|
Width
1,682 mm
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,620 - 1,645 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,248 L
|
|
Payload
370 - 385 kg
|
Payload
410 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
155 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
156 - 191 km/h
|
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
114 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, A
|
|
Brand
Abarth
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.