VS

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Hyundai Kona comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Hyundai Kona?

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Hyundai Kona: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Junior

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h

Hyundai Kona

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • marginally lighter
  • moderately more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Junior

Performance Showdown: Engine and Transmission

When it comes to performance, the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Hyundai Kona take different approaches, showcasing a variety of powertrain configurations. The Junior is offered with both electric and Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) petrol engines, delivering power outputs ranging from 136 HP to a brisk 280 HP. Its electric variant stands out with a torque of 260 Nm and an electric range between 315 km and 410 km. The Junior's diverse drivetrain options include both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 5.9 to 9.1 seconds, depending on the model.

In contrast, the Hyundai Kona presents a wide array of choices, including petrol, full hybrid, and electric engines, with horsepower ranging from 100 HP to a competitive 218 HP. The Kona also supports both manual and automatic transmissions, offering flexibility for different driving preferences. Notably, the electric Kona demonstrates an impressive electric range of up to 514 km, coupled with an efficient consumption rate of 14.6 kWh/100km.

Kona

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Both the Alfa Romeo Junior and Hyundai Kona offer efficient solutions, but their approaches differ slightly. The Junior's MHEV petrol engines boast a CO2 emission rate starting from 103 g/km, while its electric versions deliver zero emissions. Its efficiency is highlighted with fuel consumption rates as low as 4.5 L/100km, placing it effectively in CO2 efficiency classes ranging from A to D.

The Hyundai Kona strides confidently into the green arena, especially its electric model, with zero CO2 emissions. For those opting for petrol or hybrid configurations, its consumption rates start at 4.5 L/100km, aligning with CO2 efficiency classes from A to E. Whether choosing electric or petrol, both vehicles offer compelling solutions for eco-conscious consumers.

Junior

Design and Dimensions

Design plays a significant role in the identity of both models. The Alfa Romeo Junior, at 4173 mm in length and 1781 mm in width, embodies the compact, stylish traits that the brand is renowned for, while maintaining practicality with a trunk capacity of up to 415 L.

The Hyundai Kona, slightly larger, spans 4350 to 4385 mm in length and 1825 mm in width, offering a more spacious interior with a trunk capacity of 466 L. Despite its larger size, the Kona maintains an attractive balance of form and function, appealing to those who prefer a roomier ride.

Kona

Comfort and Features

Inside, both the Alfa Romeo Junior and Hyundai Kona cater to drivers seeking comfort and advanced features. Each has a seating capacity for five, focusing on passenger comfort and practicality. The Junior's upscale options reflect its Italian heritage, offering luxurious finishes and contemporary technology.

The Kona, on the other hand, emphasizes versatility and modern conveniences, ensuring a tech-forward cabin that appeals to drivers looking for a fully connected driving experience. Its spacious layout and innovative features make it a strong contender in the urban SUV market.

Junior

Conclusion: Making the Choice

Choosing between the Alfa Romeo Junior and Hyundai Kona ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. The Junior shines with its sportier performance options and Italian flair, enticing those who value style and dynamic driving. Meanwhile, the Kona's practical versatility, extensive range options, and advanced tech make it a standout choice for modern, eco-conscious drivers.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 go head-to-head in the compact electric crossover ring, pitting Kona’s tried-and-tested practicality against the EV3’s fresh-faced ambition. Which wins your driveway comes down to whether you want proven comfort and range or a cheeky new contender with surprising …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Junior

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Hyundai Kona is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Junior costs 26,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,043 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Hyundai Kona is only slightly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the Alfa Romeo Junior. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers clearly more range – reaching up to 514 km, about 104 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.

Kona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers markedly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior is moderately faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the Hyundai Kona tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 34 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Junior delivers visibly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Junior

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is marginally lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,380 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers moderately more boot space – 466 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona offers only slightly more capacity – up to 1,300 L, about 20 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries slightly more – 490 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Junior

The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.

details
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Interieur

Reviews Alfa Romeo Junior

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Kia Sportage
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Sportage go head-to-head in the compact-SUV ring — the Kona is cheeky, city-savvy and punchy, while the Sportage leans into grown-up comfort and family-friendly practicality. We’ll break down which one gives you sharper driving thrills, better everyday usability and the …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Welcome to DriveDuel’s compact-SUV throwdown: the cheeky, city-savvy Hyundai Kona goes head-to-head with the sensible, grown-up Nissan Qashqai to see which one should park in your life. Expect feisty styling and nimble urban manners from the Kona, measured space and comfort from the Qashqai — we’ll …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon is the bargain city-slicker — a compact, sensible B‑SUV that maximizes practicality and running costs for urban buyers, while the Hyundai Kona steps up with sharper styling, punchier engines (and even AWD and electrified options) for drivers who want a bit more sparkle and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia XCeed
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia XCeed is like picking between a sprightly city fox and a composed urban hatchback with SUV vibes — both promise personality, practicality and sensible running costs without breaking the bank. The Kona delivers cheeky styling and punchy handling for …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Lexus LBX
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior charms with vintage Italian flair, razor-sharp steering and pure analogue drama — it’s for drivers who buy emotion first and practicality maybe later. The Lexus LBX, by contrast, is composed, tech-rich and absurdly sensible: a compact, efficient urban crossover for buyers who …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Captur
VS
In the bustling segment of subcompact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona faces off against the Renault Captur, both vying for the top spot with unique offerings. The Hyundai Kona impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, making it a spirited choice for those craving a lively drive. Meanwhile, the …
Hyundai Kona
VW ID.3
VS
In the electrified showdown between the Hyundai Kona Electric and the Volkswagen ID.3, both cars bring distinct advantages to the table. The Kona Electric shines with its impressive range and affordability, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious consumers seeking long-distance …
Hyundai Kona
MG MG4
VS
Unsure whether the Hyundai Kona or the MG MG4 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
co2
0 - 119 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4,173 mm
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
Width
1,781 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
1,505 - 1,538 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,205 - 1,280 L
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
Payload
390 - 420 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Hyundai
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Junior have?

The Alfa Romeo Junior is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.