@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Hyundai Motor Company
VS

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Hyundai Kona – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Hyundai Kona?

Alfa Romeo Junior

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Junior @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Performance Showdown: Engine and Transmission

When it comes to performance, the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Hyundai Kona take different approaches, showcasing a variety of powertrain configurations. The Junior is offered with both electric and Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) petrol engines, delivering power outputs ranging from 136 HP to a brisk 280 HP. Its electric variant stands out with a torque of 260 Nm and an electric range between 315 km and 410 km. The Junior's diverse drivetrain options include both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 5.9 to 9.1 seconds, depending on the model.

In contrast, the Hyundai Kona presents a wide array of choices, including petrol, full hybrid, and electric engines, with horsepower ranging from 100 HP to a competitive 218 HP. The Kona also supports both manual and automatic transmissions, offering flexibility for different driving preferences. Notably, the electric Kona demonstrates an impressive electric range of up to 514 km, coupled with an efficient consumption rate of 14.6 kWh/100km.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Both the Alfa Romeo Junior and Hyundai Kona offer efficient solutions, but their approaches differ slightly. The Junior's MHEV petrol engines boast a CO2 emission rate starting from 103 g/km, while its electric versions deliver zero emissions. Its efficiency is highlighted with fuel consumption rates as low as 4.5 L/100km, placing it effectively in CO2 efficiency classes ranging from A to D.

The Hyundai Kona strides confidently into the green arena, especially its electric model, with zero CO2 emissions. For those opting for petrol or hybrid configurations, its consumption rates start at 4.5 L/100km, aligning with CO2 efficiency classes from A to E. Whether choosing electric or petrol, both vehicles offer compelling solutions for eco-conscious consumers.

Junior @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Design and Dimensions

Design plays a significant role in the identity of both models. The Alfa Romeo Junior, at 4173 mm in length and 1781 mm in width, embodies the compact, stylish traits that the brand is renowned for, while maintaining practicality with a trunk capacity of up to 415 L.

The Hyundai Kona, slightly larger, spans 4350 to 4385 mm in length and 1825 mm in width, offering a more spacious interior with a trunk capacity of 466 L. Despite its larger size, the Kona maintains an attractive balance of form and function, appealing to those who prefer a roomier ride.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Comfort and Features

Inside, both the Alfa Romeo Junior and Hyundai Kona cater to drivers seeking comfort and advanced features. Each has a seating capacity for five, focusing on passenger comfort and practicality. The Junior's upscale options reflect its Italian heritage, offering luxurious finishes and contemporary technology.

The Kona, on the other hand, emphasizes versatility and modern conveniences, ensuring a tech-forward cabin that appeals to drivers looking for a fully connected driving experience. Its spacious layout and innovative features make it a strong contender in the urban SUV market.

Junior @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Conclusion: Making the Choice

Choosing between the Alfa Romeo Junior and Hyundai Kona ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. The Junior shines with its sportier performance options and Italian flair, enticing those who value style and dynamic driving. Meanwhile, the Kona's practical versatility, extensive range options, and advanced tech make it a standout choice for modern, eco-conscious drivers.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Kona has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Alfa Romeo Junior costs 26100 £. That’s a price difference of around 3043 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 4.80 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 15.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.50 kWh.

As for range, the Hyundai Kona performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 514 km, about 104 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a noticeable edge – offering 280 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs barely noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Alfa Romeo Junior tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Junior pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 345 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is slight lighter – 1370 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers a bit more room – 466 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs minimal better – up to 1300 L, which is about 20 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.

When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona to a small extent takes the win – 490 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Hyundai Kona shows itself to be offers a more balanced package and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Alfa Romeo Junior
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £23,100
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
details

Alfa Romeo Junior

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.

details
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
AlfaRomeoJunior-Interieur @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company

Reviews Alfa Romeo Junior

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Alfa Romeo Junior
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior charms with vintage Italian flair, razor-sharp steering and pure analogue drama — it’s for drivers who buy emotion first and practicality maybe later. The Lexus LBX, by contrast, is composed, tech-rich and absurdly sensible: a compact, efficient urban crossover for buyers who …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Hyundai Kona
Junior @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Consumption
Price
26100 - 41600 £
Price
23100 - 41600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
co2
0 - 119 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4173 mm
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
Width
1781 mm
Width
1825 mm
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
Payload
390 - 420 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Hyundai

Similar Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Bayon
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon is the bargain city-slicker — a compact, sensible B‑SUV that maximizes practicality and running costs for urban buyers, while the Hyundai Kona steps up with sharper styling, punchier engines (and even AWD and electrified options) for drivers who want a bit more sparkle and …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Skoda Elroq stand out with their distinct design and performance capabilities. The Kona impresses with its dynamic styling and tech-forward interior, appealing to younger buyers, while the Elroq offers a spacious cabin and practical …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In the battle of electric versatility, the Ford Explorer EV outshines with its spacious interior and impressive towing capacity, making it an ideal choice for families and adventurers alike. Conversely, the Hyundai Kona offers a nimble driving experience and a more compact design, perfect for urban …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced technology features, offering drivers a dynamic and engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz takes a more futuristic approach, emphasizing sustainability and autonomous driving …
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Alfa Romeo Junior
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Avenger
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Alfa Romeo Junior emerges as a stylish contender with its sleek Italian design and sporty performance, while the Jeep Avenger boasts rugged capabilities and an adventurous spirit. The Junior appeals to enthusiasts seeking a dynamic driving experience, whereas the …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Kia Corporation
Kia EV3
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV6 stand out in the rapidly expanding electric SUV market, each offering unique strengths tailored to different driver preferences. The Kona impresses with its compact design and nimble handling, making it a great choice for urban environments, while the EV6 boasts a …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i30 Wagon
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai i30 Wagon and Hyundai Kona compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Alfa Romeo Junior
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Nissan Juke stands out with its bold styling and spirited performance, making it a favorite among urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Alfa Romeo Junior brings Italian flair and a sportier driving experience that is sure to attract enthusiasts seeking a …
What drive types are available for the Alfa Romeo Junior?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click