Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Nissan Juke - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (280 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (26100 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Nissan Juke?
Junior
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Juke has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Junior costs 26100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4715 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 4.80 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Juke
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a decisively edge – offering 280 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 137 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 4.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs somewhat better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Nissan Juke tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Junior pulls decisively stronger with 345 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Junior
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Juke is barely noticeable lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 106 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Juke offers barely noticeable more room – 422 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 7 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Juke performs minimal better – up to 1305 L, which is about 25 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Juke minimal takes the win – 427 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Alfa Romeo Junior holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £26,100
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Junior
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
Nissan Juke
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26100 - 41600 £
|
Price
21400 - 30100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
107 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4210 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1800 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1593 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drive types are available for the Alfa Romeo Junior?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.