VS

Hyundai Kona vs Renault Symbioz comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 24,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Renault Symbioz?

Hyundai Kona vs Renault Symbioz: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Symbioz

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • a bit more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Kona

Hyundai Kona vs. Renault Symbioz: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the evolving landscape of the automotive market, the compact SUV segment has garnered significant attention for its versatility, efficiency, and technological advancements. Two notable contenders in this category are the Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz. Both offer compelling features, but how do they compare in terms of technical specifications and innovations? Let’s dive into the details.

Symbioz

Engine and Performance

The Hyundai Kona comes with a diverse range of powertrains to cater to various driver preferences. It offers petrol, full hybrid, and fully electric options, with power ratings ranging from 100 HP to a robust 218 HP. Each variant provides a different performance signature, with the impressive electric models achieving a top speed of 201 km/h and a swift acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as quick as 7.8 seconds. This makes the Kona not just a practical choice but also a sporty one.

On the other hand, the Renault Symbioz exclusively features a full hybrid engine producing 143 HP. While it has a slightly lower maximum speed of 170 km/h and a 0-100 km/h time of 10.6 seconds, it remains competitive with its efficient fuel consumption of just 4.8 L/100km. For those who prioritize efficiency over raw power, the Symbioz may prove to be the better option.

Kona

Design and Dimensions

In terms of exterior dimensions, the Hyundai Kona is slightly shorter than the Renault Symbioz, measuring 4350 mm in length compared to the Symbioz's 4413 mm. However, the Kona is wider at 1825 mm versus the Symbioz's 1797 mm, which helps to create a sportier stance on the road. The Kona also boasts a height of 1585 mm, providing a commanding driving position.

Interiors in both SUVs offer comfortable seating for five passengers, with the Kona providing a trunk capacity of 466 liters, slightly lower than the Symbioz's 492 liters. This makes the Symbioz a preferable option for those needing additional cargo space.

Symbioz

Fuel Economy and Emissions

The Kona presents impressive fuel efficiency statistics across its petrol and hybrid variants. Its fuel consumption ranges from 4.5 to 6.7 L/100km, depending on the engine selected. Its electric variants also shine with a consumption of just 14.6 to 16.8 kWh/100km and an electric driving range of up to 514 km.

Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz earns high marks for its efficiency with CO2 emissions of 109 g/km, which aligns it within a respectable CO2 efficiency class C. Its single full hybrid engine configuration ensures lower emissions while retaining performance.

Kona

Innovation and Technology

Hyundai has equipped the Kona with cutting-edge technology, including an advanced infotainment system, multiple drive modes, and safety features like lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control. Moreover, the Kona’s hybrid and electric variants are imbued with regenerative braking technology, enhancing energy efficiency during drives.

Renault's Symbioz focuses heavily on integration with smart technology, emphasizing connectivity through its multimedia system that seamlessly integrates with smartphones and home devices. It embodies Renault's commitment to a smart and eco-friendly future, showcasing their innovative hybrid technology.

Symbioz

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz ultimately depends on individual preferences and requirements. For those seeking a versatile SUV with multiple powertrain options and sporty performance, the Hyundai Kona stands out. However, for drivers leaning towards efficiency and smart technology integration, the Renault Symbioz offers an excellent choice.

Both vehicles showcase the automakers' commitment to innovation and sustainability in the ever-competitive SUV market. Depending on your priorities, either of these remarkable SUVs could be the perfect fit for your driving needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Hyundai Kona is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Renault Symbioz costs 24,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,371 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Symbioz

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers visibly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Renault Symbioz is marginally faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Hyundai Kona tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 265 Nm.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is marginally lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 11 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers a bit more boot space – 576 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Symbioz offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,682 L, about 382 L more than the Hyundai Kona.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries very slightly more – 490 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.

details
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
102 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
Length
4,413 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Height
1,575 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
455 - 459 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.