VS

Hyundai Kona vs Renault Symbioz comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 24,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Renault Symbioz?

Hyundai Kona vs Renault Symbioz: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Symbioz

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kona

Hyundai Kona VS Renault Symbioz — clear-minded comparison

Hyundai Kona VS Renault Symbioz bring two different takes on the compact SUV brief: the Kona aims for everyday comfort and usable space, while the Symbioz prioritises low consumption and clever packaging. The Kona feels like a grown-up B‑SUV that quietly emphasises room and straightforward technology. The Symbioz reads as a pragmatic, efficiency-first compact with a sliding rear bench that changes how you use the car day-to-day. This piece focuses on how those philosophical differences matter for real buyers, not on spec sheets.

Symbioz

Driving character and dynamics

The Hyundai Kona steers and rides with an assured, composed personality — predictable rather than thrilling — which suits city traffic and relaxed cruising. The Renault Symbioz is even more laid-back: its steering and chassis bias towards comfort and low-effort driving but give very little feedback for anyone who likes a sharper connection. In short, Kona is competent and confidence-inspiring without excitement; Symbioz encourages an easy, uneventful commute. If you like to be pushed into corners, neither is a sports car, but Kona will feel more stable when you up the tempo. If smooth, low-strain progress is your priority, Symbioz nudges ahead.

Kona

Comfort, noise and long-distance behavior

On long runs the Kona’s setup leans toward composed comfort — especially on modest wheel sizes — though its hybrid powertrains can get a bit vocal under heavy load. The Symbioz is quietly efficient at highway speeds and rewards steady cruising with a very relaxed cabin atmosphere, yet you’ll notice sharper impacts over town potholes, particularly with larger wheels. Wind and tyre noise are handled differently: Kona tends to feel a touch more insulated in everyday conditions, while Symbioz shines at steady-speed economy and serenity. For long-distance travellers who value calm cruising and fuel economy, Symbioz is appealing; families who want a cushier, predictable ride on mixed roads may prefer Kona.

Symbioz

Practicality and family usability

Practicality is where the Kona makes its case: a very usable load area and thoughtful storage make it a reliable family companion for shopping and weekend trips. The Symbioz flips the script with a sliding rear bench that lets you trade cargo space for legroom in seconds, which is a real benefit for variable family duties. Kona gives more straightforward luggage volume and a wide boot opening; Symbioz’s battery packaging can affect load height but its bench flexibility often beats fixed arrangements in daily use. If you regularly carry taller items and need maximum boot volume, Kona is the simpler choice; if you swap kids, prams and grocery runs and want configurability, Symbioz is more versatile.

Kona

Cabin feel, infotainment and perceived quality

The Kona’s interior presents as modern and slightly upscale for the segment: clear controls, physical buttons that reduce distraction, and displays that are easy to live with day after day. Renault’s Symbioz leans into a very usable Google-based infotainment setup that many buyers will find quicker and more intuitive for navigation and voice tasks. Materials in the Kona generally feel better judged, while the Symbioz trades a touch of perceived premium finish for function and connectivity. Assistants and cameras are another split: Kona’s systems can be a bit over-eager and noisy, whereas Symbioz occasionally shows rough edges in camera quality and some assistants’ behaviour. If you prize infotainment speed and Google integration, Symbioz is attractive; if tactile switches and a slightly more refined look matter, Kona has the edge.

Symbioz

Which buyer each car suits — the trade-offs that matter

Choose the Hyundai Kona if you want a roomy, comfort-oriented compact SUV with straightforward tech and a more composed everyday presence — it’s tailored for small families and buyers who value usable luggage room and calmer handling. Opt for the Renault Symbioz if your priority is running costs, clever interior flexibility and a fast, familiar Google infotainment experience — it fits commuters and efficiency-minded families who appreciate practical versatility. Both are sensible, but they serve different practical needs: Kona leans toward spacious comfort, Symbioz toward thrifty, flexible utility. The technical comparison that follows will map those real-world differences to drivetrain, space and equipment details so you can match features to your priorities.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …
Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Hyundai Kona is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Renault Symbioz costs 24,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,628 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Symbioz

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers visibly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 265 Nm.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is marginally lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 11 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers a bit more boot space – 576 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries very slightly more – 490 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 380 - 510 km
details
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:23:42

The Kona is an SUV that delivers, especially in terms of driving comfort. It's noticeably easier to get into and settle into as you get older. Less feisty than the MG4 but slightly more economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.

details
R-DAM_1579937
R-DAM_1580039
R-DAM_1579964

Reviews Renault Symbioz

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
PF
19 Feb 2026, 11:56:45

A delightful hybrid (family car). Roomy, quick (combined nearly 150 hp) and safe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
5 Dec 2025, 23:17:28

I've been driving the Symbioz Full Hybrid with the iconic trim for 3,500 km. I test-drove both cars. I think the win goes to the Symbioz. Good quality at a family-friendly price. Unfortunately the Opel is simply too expensive. Strangely, what never really gets mentioned is that the Symbioz's suspension is absolutely superb.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Peugeot 3008
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Peugeot 3008 and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different takes on modern motoring: the 3008 is a production compact SUV known for its practicality and refined interior, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward‑looking concept showcasing electric, autonomous and connected technologies. …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Symbioz
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
The Renault Symbioz is pure auto theater — a futuristic, electric concept that showcases bold ideas about autonomous driving and cabin-as-living-room luxury rather than everyday practicality. The Mitsubishi Grandis, by contrast, is a dependable, no‑nonsense people‑carrier: roomy, affordable and …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai with the Renault Symbioz highlights a clash between a proven compact crossover and Renault's forward-looking Symbioz concept that showcases the brand's electric and connected ambitions. This comparison will focus on how they differ in design, practicality and technology …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
Price
24,700 - 30,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
102 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
455 - 459 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Renault
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.