In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced technology features, offering drivers a dynamic and engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz takes a more futuristic approach, emphasizing sustainability and autonomous driving capabilities, making it a symbol of the brand's vision for the future of mobility. While the Kona appeals to enthusiasts seeking a stylish and versatile vehicle, the Symbioz captivates with its innovative concepts that challenge conventional automotive norms.
In the evolving landscape of the automotive market, the compact SUV segment has garnered significant attention for its versatility, efficiency, and technological advancements. Two notable contenders in this category are the Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz. Both offer compelling features, but how do they compare in terms of technical specifications and innovations? Let’s dive into the details.
The Hyundai Kona comes with a diverse range of powertrains to cater to various driver preferences. It offers petrol, full hybrid, and fully electric options, with power ratings ranging from 100 HP to a robust 218 HP. Each variant provides a different performance signature, with the impressive electric models achieving a top speed of 201 km/h and a swift acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as quick as 7.8 seconds. This makes the Kona not just a practical choice but also a sporty one.
On the other hand, the Renault Symbioz exclusively features a full hybrid engine producing 143 HP. While it has a slightly lower maximum speed of 170 km/h and a 0-100 km/h time of 10.6 seconds, it remains competitive with its efficient fuel consumption of just 4.8 L/100km. For those who prioritize efficiency over raw power, the Symbioz may prove to be the better option.
In terms of exterior dimensions, the Hyundai Kona is slightly shorter than the Renault Symbioz, measuring 4350 mm in length compared to the Symbioz's 4413 mm. However, the Kona is wider at 1825 mm versus the Symbioz's 1797 mm, which helps to create a sportier stance on the road. The Kona also boasts a height of 1585 mm, providing a commanding driving position.
Interiors in both SUVs offer comfortable seating for five passengers, with the Kona providing a trunk capacity of 466 liters, slightly lower than the Symbioz's 492 liters. This makes the Symbioz a preferable option for those needing additional cargo space.
The Kona presents impressive fuel efficiency statistics across its petrol and hybrid variants. Its fuel consumption ranges from 4.5 to 6.7 L/100km, depending on the engine selected. Its electric variants also shine with a consumption of just 14.6 to 16.8 kWh/100km and an electric driving range of up to 514 km.
Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz earns high marks for its efficiency with CO2 emissions of 109 g/km, which aligns it within a respectable CO2 efficiency class C. Its single full hybrid engine configuration ensures lower emissions while retaining performance.
Hyundai has equipped the Kona with cutting-edge technology, including an advanced infotainment system, multiple drive modes, and safety features like lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control. Moreover, the Kona’s hybrid and electric variants are imbued with regenerative braking technology, enhancing energy efficiency during drives.
Renault's Symbioz focuses heavily on integration with smart technology, emphasizing connectivity through its multimedia system that seamlessly integrates with smartphones and home devices. It embodies Renault's commitment to a smart and eco-friendly future, showcasing their innovative hybrid technology.
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz ultimately depends on individual preferences and requirements. For those seeking a versatile SUV with multiple powertrain options and sporty performance, the Hyundai Kona stands out. However, for drivers leaning towards efficiency and smart technology integration, the Renault Symbioz offers an excellent choice.
Both vehicles showcase the automakers' commitment to innovation and sustainability in the ever-competitive SUV market. Depending on your priorities, either of these remarkable SUVs could be the perfect fit for your driving needs.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 22600 - 41600
£
|
Price
about 26500 - 30400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
377 - 514
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.6
kWh
|
co2
128, 103, 141, 152, 0
g/km
|
co2
109
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773
kg
|
Curb weight
1498
kg
|
Trunk capacity
466
L
|
Trunk capacity
492
L
|
Length
4350 - 4385
mm
|
Length
4413
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Width
1797
mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585
mm
|
Height
1575
mm
|
Payload
420 - 490
kg
|
Payload
427
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
100 - 218
HP
|
Power HP
143
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 13.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6
s
|
Max Speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Max Speed
170
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 265
Nm
|
Torque
250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
74 - 160
kW
|
Power kW
105
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598
cm3
|
Top speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Top speed
170
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.